PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 31, 2011Atmospheric Science Letters517 citationsOpen Access

The Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP)

View Full Paper
BKBen KravitzARAlan RobockOBOliviér Boucher

Key Points

  • To evaluate the effects of stratospheric geoengineering using sulphate aerosols across various climate models.
  • Proposing standard forcing scenarios for multiple climate models.
  • Comparing results from different modeling groups to assess robustness.
  • Recommending four experiments focused on stratospheric aerosols.
  • Identified varying responses among climate models to geoengineering scenarios.
  • Demonstrated the need for standardized approaches in modeling geoengineering effects.
  • Outlined future experiments to explore other geoengineering methods.

Abstract

Abstract To evaluate the effects of stratospheric geoengineering with sulphate aerosols, we propose standard forcing scenarios to be applied to multiple climate models to compare their results and determine the robustness of their responses. Thus far, different modeling groups have used different forcing scenarios for both global warming and geoengineering, complicating the comparison of results. We recommend four experiments to explore the extent to which geoengineering might offset climate change projected in some of the Climate Model Intercomparison Project 5 experiments. These experiments focus on stratospheric aerosols, but future experiments under this framework may focus on different means of geoengineering. Copyright © 2011 Royal Meteorological Society and Crown copyright

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Kravitz et al. (2011) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/698b54620540ea04fbfded90https://doi.org/10.1002/asl.316
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper