Knowledge Concerning Land Management for Metropolitan Governance in the U.S.A.

Metropolitan governance in the U.S. has taken shape over generations and is still evolving. The U.S. territory is literally covered by a myriad of institutions responsible for influencing the country’s physical destiny, cultural identity, and digital representations. Due to their growing complexity, metropolitan areas require adequate institutional mechanisms capable of steering the physical, socio-economic, ecological, and digital transformations within their jurisdictional boundaries. The research question at the core of this article is the following: Where does knowledge concerning land management for metropolitan governance in the U.S.A. come from? This paper aims to review metropolitan governance’s evolution, state of the art, and current challenges in the U.S. at the beginning of the 21st century. The methods consisted mostly of reviews of specialized literature as well as an analysis of two metropolitan archetypal case studies on opposite ends of the country: the sprawling Southwest (Phoenix, Arizona) and the shrinking Northeast Rust Belt (the Albany Capital Region of upstate New York). It is argued that although the Councils of Government (COGs) and metropolitan planning organizations (MPOs) are invaluable in producing land cover and land use change atlases and toolkits of their territories, fragmented units of government within metropolises intensify economic and fiscal disparities and can potentially undermine regional competitiveness and efficiency. The article’s key findings revolve around the current and most pressing challenges and strategies with the potential to move metropolitan governance institutions toward greater regional cooperation and planning.