PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 16, 20260 citationsOpen Access

Sample Size Calculation and Power Analysis for the General Mediation Analysis Method

View Full Paper
NRNubaira RizviABAmjila BamWCWentao Cao

Key Points

  • This research aims to enhance the accuracy of power analysis and sample size determination for mediation analysis involving non-normal distributions.
  • Proposed a simulation-based approach utilizing monotone smoothing splines to estimate empirical critical values.
  • Valuated method across scenarios, including continuous and binary variables, and time-to-event outcomes.
  • Controlled for Type I error while estimating power for various effect sizes.
  • Achieved >80% power with minimal sample sizes (n=25-50) for large effects (0.35).
  • Observed small effects (0.02) required larger samples (n=410 for continuous; n>500 for fully binary models).
  • Medium effects (0.15) showed >0.80 power at n=75 with binary mediators.

Abstract

Mediation analysis is a widely used statistical technique for identifying the mechanisms underlying the relationship between an exposure and an outcome. However, accurate power analysis and sample size determination for mediation models that involve non-normal distributions or mixtures of continuous and binary variables are challenging. We propose a computationally efficient simulation-based approach for general mediation analysis. By applying monotone smoothing splines to estimate empirical critical values derived from extensive simulations, our method enables accurate power calculations without the need for real-time simulation. We validated the method across varying scenarios, including continuous, binary variables and time-to-event outcome with strict Type I error control. The method-quantified large effects (0.35) yielded >80% power at minimal sample sizes (n = 25–50) across all settings, while small effects (0.02) required larger samples. Continuous models achieved 80% power for small effects at n = 410, whereas fully binary models required n > 500. For medium effects (0.15), the power was >0.80 at n = 75 with binary mediators. This study presents a robust framework that combines the flexibility of simulation-based inference with the speed of analytical approximations. We provide an accompanying R package to facilitate efficient sample size planning for mediation models.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Rizvi et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6992652ceb1f82dc367a0faahttps://doi.org/10.3390/stats9010019
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper