PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 22, 2026Clinical Cancer Research0 citations

Abstract PS3-02-30 : Ancestry-specific prevalence of pathogenic variants among patients with breast cancer who do not meet guidelines for genetic testing

View Full Paper
RBRyan BernhiselMKMatthew KuceraSCS. Cummings

Key Points

  • This research aims to evaluate the prevalence of germline pathogenic variants in breast cancer patients who do not qualify for genetic testing based on current guidelines.
  • Constructed multivariable logistic regression models to assess prevalence trends.
  • Analyzed a cohort of 245,669 female breast cancer patients referred for hereditary cancer testing.
  • Assessed ancestry-specific prevalence for 25-48 hereditary cancer genes.
  • Evaluated patients diagnosed at older ages with no family history or prior personal history of cancer.
  • Overall prevalence of pathogenic variants was 6.3% for those diagnosed at age 50 and 3.6% at age 80.
  • The highest prevalence of pathogenic variants was among Hispanic women.
  • Pathogenic variants were frequently found in genes such as BRCA1, BRCA2, CHEK2, ATM, and PALB2.

Abstract

Abstract Background Patients with breast cancer (BC) who harbor germline pathogenic variants (PVs) in hereditary cancer genes have improved survival when their surgical and treatment decisions are tailored to their specific genetic alterations. Additionally, the identification of germline PVs is crucial for family members, as it allows for interventions that can decrease cancer-related morbidity and mortality. Commonly utilized guidelines recommend genetic testing only under specific conditions: if cancer is diagnosed at a young age, typically at or before the age of 50; if there is a strong family history (FH) of cancer; or if there are specific tumor characteristics. Several studies have demonstrated that many patients who do not meet these criteria unknowingly carry PVs and may, therefore, be receiving suboptimal care. In the United States, Black and Hispanic women face disproportionately high rates of BC mortality, highlighting the importance of genetic testing in these populations. It is unclear whether guideline-based restrictions differentially impact women of certain ancestral backgrounds. Here, we explore this question by estimating PV prevalence among BC patients of Asian, Black/African, Hispanic, Multiple, and White/non-Hispanic ancestries who do not meet guidelines for genetic testing. Methods Multivariable logistic regression models were constructed to analyze trends in the prevalence of PVs based on age, personal/family history, and ancestry in a consecutive cohort of patients referred for hereditary cancer testing with a multigene panel. We report ancestry-specific model-based estimates of prevalence for patients diagnosed with BC at older ages with no FH and no prior personal history of cancer of any type. Prevalence is summarized overall for 25-48 hereditary cancer genes with guideline-based medical management recommendations, as well as for the genes most frequently implicated in BC. Results The study cohort comprised 245,669 female patients affected by BC. There were 8,025 (3.3%) Asian, 25,900 (10.5%) Black/African, 20,022 (8.1%) Hispanic, 141,279 (57.5%) White/non-Hispanic patients, and 16,689 (6.8%) patients with multiple self-reported ancestries. Estimates of PV prevalence for a patient with BC with no FH and no prior personal history of cancer of any type were similar across ancestries, with the highest prevalence among Hispanic women (Table). Overall prevalence estimates were 6.3% for those diagnosed at age 50 and 3.6% among those diagnosed at age 80. PVs were most frequently identified in BRCA1, BRCA2, CHEK2, ATM, and PALB2 (Table). Conclusions Among patients with BC of all ancestries, a substantial fraction of patients who do not meet guidelines for genetic testing may unknowingly carry PVs. Elimination of age-based restrictions on genetic testing could improve the survival of patients with BC and positively impact their family members. Citation Format: R. Bernhisel, M. Kucera, S. Cummings, E. Smith, T. Simmons, E. Hughes. Ancestry-specific prevalence of pathogenic variants among patients with breast cancer who do not meet guidelines for genetic testing abstract. In: Proceedings of the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2025; 2025 Dec 9-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2026;32(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS3-02-30.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Bernhisel et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/699a9dc0482488d673cd3cc0https://doi.org/10.1158/1557-3265.sabcs25-ps3-02-30
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Abstract PS3-05-14: Clinical significance of pathogenic variants in breast cancer patients at risk for hereditary breast cancer2026
  2. 2Abstract PS3-02-07: Co-occurring pathogenic variants in patients with breast cancer2026
  3. 3Abstract PO4-08-05: Disparities in Genetic Testing Patterns and Positivity Among Patients with Breast Cancer in the CancerLINQ Real-World Oncology Database2024
  4. 4Abstract A020: Impact of universal germline testing on pathogenic/likely pathogenic variant frequency among breast cancer patients in Southern California2024
  5. 5Abstract RF5-04: Germline pathogenic variants in the personalized screening arm of the WISDOM Study: Findings from 23,098 women with no personal history of breast cancer2026