PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 22, 2026Journal of Molecular Pathology0 citationsOpen Access

Evaluation of Predictive Markers for Immunotherapy in Colorectal Cancer: Concordance Between MMR Protein Expression and Microsatellite Instability in a Retrospective Series

View Full Paper
GMGiulia MartinelliRBRossella BrunoMGMarco Maria Germani

Key Points

  • This research aims to assess the utility of various biomarkers, including microsatellite instability (MSI), for predicting immunotherapy outcomes in metastatic colorectal cancer.
  • Analyzed 138 metastatic colorectal cancer tumor samples using immunohistochemistry for MMR status and PCR for MSI assessment.
  • Conducted comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) with FoundationOne CDx to assess additional mutations and tumor molecular burden (TMB).
  • Determined concordance between MMR status and MSI, discussing discordant cases.
  • 12 tumors were identified as mismatch repair-deficient (dMMR), with 10 exhibiting high microsatellite instability (MSI) and high TMB (>10 mut/Mb).
  • CGP and PCR assessments showed 98% concordance in MSI status compared to MMR.
  • In two cases, CGP revealed pathogenic mutations in additional genes despite an dMMR status, highlighting the potential complexity in mutation profiles.

Abstract

Background/Objectives: In metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) the evaluation of mismatch repair (MMR) and microsatellite instability (MSI) status is essential to identify patients eligible for treatment with immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICI). This study aims to evaluate the potential utility of Comprehensive Genomic Profiling (CGP) in assessing MSI status, in addition to other immunotherapy-predictive biomarkers such as high tumor molecular burden (TMB) and the POLE and POLD1 mutations. Methods: A total of 138 mCRC tumor samples underwent a first-level molecular test (MMR status by immunohistochemistry, MSI by a melting-based PCR approach and RAS/BRAF mutational status by a small next-generation sequencing (NGS) panel) and second-level CGP analysis by the FoundationOne CDx assay. The prevalence of dMMR and MSI tumors was reported. Moreover, the concordance between the MMR and MSI status was determined, and discordant cases were discussed. Results: Twelve cases (8.7%) were MMR-deficient (dMMR); 10 showed high MSI and TMB (>10 mut/Mb). MSI status assessed by CGP and PCR was concordant in all cases except one MSH6-deficient tumor. Two dMMR cases were stable with low TMB. Moreover, in two MLH1/PMS2-deficient cases CGP revealed pathogenic alterations in the MSH2 and MSH6 genes; in both cases, the MLH1 promoter was hypermethylated. A high TMB was the only positive biomarker in 11 cases with a proficient MMR system and no MSI. Conclusions: MSI assessment by CGP analysis showed high concordance (98%) with MMR and was helpful in evaluating ICI eligibility in three out of twelve dMMR cases. Overall, compared to standard methods, analyzing a broader range of microsatellite loci and the simultaneous assessment of multiple predictive biomarkers by CGP may increase diagnostic accuracy and improve therapeutic assessment.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Martinelli et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/699a9ded482488d673cd43ebhttps://doi.org/10.3390/jmp7010009
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper