PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 26, 2007New England Journal of Medicine4,724 citationsOpen Access

Optimal Medical Therapy with or without PCI for Stable Coronary Disease

View Full Paper
WBWilliam E. BodenRORobert A. O’RourkeKTKoon Teo

Key Points

  • To assess the impact of adding percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) to optimal medical therapy in patients with stable coronary artery disease.
  • Randomized trial design

Structured PICO

Does PCI reduce the risk of death, myocardial infarction, or other major cardiovascular events when added to optimal medical therapy in patients with stable coronary artery disease?

P
Population
Patients with stable coronary artery disease
I
Intervention
PCI added to optimal medical therapy
C
Comparator
Optimal medical therapy alone
O
Outcome
Death, myocardial infarction, or other major cardiovascular eventscomposite

In patients with stable coronary artery disease, an initial management strategy of PCI added to optimal medical therapy does not reduce major cardiovascular events compared to optimal medical therapy alone.

Abstract

Background: In patients with stable coronary artery disease, it remains unclear whether an initial management strategy of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with intensive pharmacologic therapy and lifestyle intervention (optimal medical therapy) is superior to optimal medical therapy alone in reducing the risk of cardiovascular events. Methods: We conducted a randomized trial involving 2287 patients who had objective evidence of myocardial ischemia and significant coronary artery disease at 50 U.S. and Canadian centers. Between 1999 and 2004, we assigned 1149 patients to undergo PCI with optimal medical therapy (PCI group) and 1138 to receive optimal medical therapy alone (medical-therapy group). The primary outcome was death from any cause and nonfatal myocardial infarction during a follow-up period of 2.5 to 7.0 years (median, 4.6). Results: There were 211 primary events in the PCI group and 202 events in the medical-therapy group. The 4.6-year cumulative primary-event rates were 19.0% in the PCI group and 18.5% in the medical-therapy group (hazard ratio for the PCI group, 1.05; 95% confidence interval CI, 0.87 to 1.27; P=0.62). There were no significant differences between the PCI group and the medical-therapy group in the composite of death, myocardial infarction, and stroke (20.0% vs. 19.5%; hazard ratio, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.87 to 1.27; P=0.62); hospitalization for acute coronary syndrome (12.4% vs. 11.8%; hazard ratio, 1.07; 95% CI, 0.84 to 1.37; P=0.56); or myocardial infarction (13.2% vs. 12.3%; hazard ratio, 1.13; 95% CI, 0.89 to 1.43; P=0.33). Conclusions: As an initial management strategy in patients with stable coronary artery disease, PCI did not reduce the risk of death, myocardial infarction, or other major cardiovascular events when added to optimal medical therapy. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00007657 .)

Expert Takes1 quote

““What we found with those patients is that PCI has almost the same efficacy as a placebo procedure. You often end up finding diffuse disease that you didn’t expect, and where you find that, you should probably just treat that patient with conservative therapy.””

TCTMDView source
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Boden et al. (2007) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/699c76b8dc4c263ead9410efhttps://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa070829
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper