PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 2, 2026Palliative Care and Social Practice0 citationsOpen Access

General practitioners’ relational familiarity with home-dwelling patients in the palliative phase: Basis – or bias – for individualised care

View Full Paper
KSKatrine StaatsSSSandra Jahr SvendsenVLVeronica Lockertsen

Key Points

  • To explore how GPs’ relational familiarity influences individualised care in home-based palliative settings.
  • Conducted a secondary hermeneutic analysis of data from two qualitative studies with 21 GPs.
  • Utilised in-depth interviews and focus group discussions for data collection.
  • Applied the hermeneutic circle iteratively for interpretation.
  • Identified two themes: relational familiarity enables trust and tailored care but can lead to overfamiliarity.
  • Variability in GP engagement was linked to personal interests and systemic constraints.
  • Relational familiarity, while facilitating care, also caused disparities in care quality.

Abstract

Background: An ageing population has increased the need for home-based palliative care. General practitioners (GPs) are central to continuity of care, yet time pressure and organisational constraints can challenge person-centred practice grounded in relational familiarity with patients and families. Objectives: This study aims to explore how GPs navigate the relational familiarity in home-based palliative care and whether it functions as a basis or a bias for individualised care. Design and methods: A secondary hermeneutic analysis was conducted, utilising data from two qualitative studies involving 21 GPs. These datasets focused on dignity-preserving care and shared decision making in palliative contexts. The hermeneutic circle was applied in an iterative process to interpret the in-depth interviews and focus group discussions. Study Design: A qualitative, explorative, and descriptive design grounded in hermeneutic methodology. Results: Two overarching themes emerged: (1) Relational familiarity: A cornerstone of complex dimensions, where familiarity enabled trust, continuity and tailored care; however, it also created overfamiliarity that narrows perspective, blurs boundaries and burdens GPs. (2) Variability in engagement and follow-up, which reflected differences in individual GPs’ interests, systemic constraints and the involvement of other healthcare professionals. While relational familiarity facilitated person-centred care, it was unevenly distributed, creating disparities in the quality of care. Conclusion: Relational familiarity is key to person-centred palliative care, fostering trust and continuity. However, it can blur boundaries, create emotional strain and contribute to inequities compounded by systemic challenges. Interdisciplinary collaboration and flexible care models are needed to adapt to patient needs and ensure equitable access. Future research should examine the impact of relational familiarity and the role of systemic reforms to enhance palliative care.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Staats et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69a52f63f1e85e5c73bf2433https://doi.org/10.1177/26323524261426398
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Being Seen as a Unique Person is Essential in Palliative Care at Home and Nursing Homes: A Qualitative Study With Patients and Relatives2024 · 1 citations
  2. 2Standing next to but not being part of: relatives’ experiences of support from healthcare professionals when general palliative care is provided at home2026
  3. 3Care of patients in nursing homes, what stumbling blocks and stepping for general practitioners? A qualitative study2024
  4. 4Addressing barriers to interprofessional working with homecare workers in community palliative care: insights from a multi-site qualitative case study in England2025
  5. 5Improving General Practitioner involvement in Care Home End-of-Life Care. A Systematic Literature Review and Narrative Synthesis.2026