PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 7, 20261 citations

Wielding the power of knowledge:anti-gender mobilizations and the strategic (mis)use of epistemic authority /

View Full Paper
NPNina PergerRKRoman Kuhar

Key Points

  • The aim is to investigate how anti-gender mobilizations misuse knowledge and claim epistemic authority to support their views.
  • Conducted a mixed-methods analysis of the manual Children Are at Stake!
  • Coded 24 references cited in the manual
  • Analyzed the relationship between those sources and their supporting claims
  • Identified three distinct techniques of knowledge misuse: Torsion Technique, Magician's Technique, and Echo Technique.
  • Demonstrated how anti-gender actors exploit scientific authority for ideological purposes.
  • Highlighted the creation of alternative epistemologies that undermine critical scholarship.

Abstract

This article examines how anti-gender mobilizations strategically (mis)use knowledge and epistemic authority to legitimize their claims. Focusing on the manual Children Are at Stake! A Manual for Mothers, Fathers, and Teachers to Protect Children from LGBTQIA+ Ideology , we situate our analysis within broader global patterns of anti-gender campaigns that target schools, universities, and academic freedom. While previous scholarship has described such practices as ‘troll science’ or ‘counterknowledge’, our study advances this work by identifying the specific mechanisms through which such knowledge is produced and mobilized. Using a mixed-methods approach, we coded 24 references cited in the manual and analysed the relationship between these sources and the claims they were used to support. The results show three distinct techniques of knowledge (mis)use: the Torsion Technique (twisting knowledge through interpretative extension or distortion), the Magician’s Technique (fabricating relevance through phantomized or invented connections), and the Echo Technique (accurately summarizing ideologically aligned but questionable sources). Together, these strategies demonstrate how anti-gender actors exploit the symbolic authority of science, often stripped of context and sensationalized, to produce a parallel politics of knowledge. We argue that these practices not only delegitimize critical scholarship but also generate alternative epistemologies that reinforce retrotopian visions of social order.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Perger et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69abc2855af8044f7a4ec2b0https://doi.org/10.1080/09589236.2026.2637522
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper