PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 22, 20260 citationsOpen Access

CCEGA Validated Against Five Observational Datasets: NICER, GW170817, and PSR J0952-0607

View Full Paper
MSMarc López Sánchez

Key Points

  • The study aims to validate the CCEGA framework using multiple observational datasets to understand neutron-star properties.
  • Compared density-dependent gravitational coupling G_eff(ρ) predictions with observational data.
  • Analyzed NICER mass-radius measurements for three pulsars.
  • Evaluated tidal deformability against GW170817 data.
  • Assessed mass of PSR J0952-0607 to determine consistency with CCEGA predictions.
  • Predicted neutron-star radii are ~10% larger than General Relativity (GR) estimates.
  • Maximum mass predictions are consistent with observations, specifically for PSR J0952-0607.
  • No observations currently exclude the CCEGA model, supporting its validity.

Abstract

We present a systematic validation of the CCEGA framework against five independent observational datasets. CCEGA predicts a density-dependent gravitational coupling Gₑff (ρ) = G·exp (−ρ/ρc) with ρc ≥ 10 ρₙuclear, producing neutron-star radii ~10% larger than GR and maximum masses ~5% larger. Against NICER mass-radius measurements, all three pulsars (J0437-4715, J0030+0451, J0740+6620) are consistent at ≤1. 0σ. Against GW170817, the predicted tidal deformability ratio ΛCCEGA/ΛGR = 1. 570 is consistent with the 90% credible interval for soft-to-moderate equations of state (ΛGR < 369). Against PSR J0952-0607 (M = 2. 35 ± 0. 11 M☉, Romani+2025), CCEGA provides a natural explanation: if the GR equation of state supports MₘaxGR = 2. 24 M☉, the 5% CCEGA enhancement gives MₘaxCCEGA = 2. 35 M☉ — exactly the observed value. No observation excludes CCEGA. The framework is consistent with all current neutron-star data, with decisive tests pending from LIGO O5 (tidal deformability), future NICER precision (radii), and the Einstein Telescope (gravitational-wave echoes, ~2035).

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Marc López Sánchez (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69bf89a9f665edcd009e988ahttps://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19139349
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper