PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 5, 2026Technology in Cancer Research & Treatment1 citationsOpen Access

Fully Automated Stain Quantification Framework for IHC Whole Slide Images in Breast Cancer

View Full Paper
TYT. YinFLF. LifrangeZDZoë Denis

Key Points

  • This research aims to develop a fully automated framework for quantifying immunohistochemistry stains in breast cancer.
  • Developed a three-module deep learning framework for tumor-stroma segmentation, nuclei segmentation, and H-score estimation.
  • Fine-tuned using 87 expert-annotated patches for accuracy in scoring.
  • Validated the framework internally and externally on 100 WSIs and HER2 classification.
  • Achieved a Spearman's rank correlation of 0.84 in internal validation, matching expert pathologist variability.
  • Demonstrated 86% accuracy in HER2 classification and a mean absolute error of 21 in CD73 scoring.

Abstract

IntroductionImmunohistochemistry (IHC) plays a crucial role in breast cancer diagnosis, treatment selection, and research. However, manual scoring of IHC whole slide images (WSIs) is time-consuming and suffers from inter- and intra-observer variability.MethodsTo help address these challenges, we present and publicly release a fully automated, compartment-specific (ie, tumor and stroma) H-scoring framework for IHC analysis. The framework consists of three deep learning modules: tumor-stroma segmentation, nuclei segmentation, and H-score estimation for tumor and stroma. It processes WSIs in minutes, delivering consistent and reproducible H-scores with accuracy comparable to expert pathologists. The modular design also allows flexibility for use in other IHC tasks such as cellularity quantification, and supports configuration options to balance accuracy and computational efficiency.ResultsFine-tuned on 87 expert-annotated patches, the framework achieved a Spearman's rank correlation (ρ) in internal validation of 0.84 (95% confidence interval CI: 0.77-0.89) across 100 expert-annotated WSIs, outperforming state-of-the-art (ρ = 0.78, 95% CI: 0.68-0.85) and matching the inter-observer variability between two expert pathologists (ρ = 0.84, 95% CI: 0.63-0.94). In external validation, it achieved 86% accuracy in HER2 classification (0-3+) and a mean absolute error of 21 ± 10 (range: 5-46) in CD73 scoring, where ground truth H-scores were all 0.ConclusionThe framework achieves agreement comparable to that of expert pathologists, underscoring its clinical utility in providing reproducible IHC scores that can reduce diagnostic variability and support consistent treatment decisions. The code is available at https://github.com/YinTuo/AutoIHC.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Yin et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d1fd8ea79560c99a0a3a06https://doi.org/10.1177/15330338251407734
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Development and Validation of Fully Automatic Deep Learning-Based Algorithms for Immunohistochemistry Reporting of Invasive Breast Ductal Carcinoma2024 · 1 citations
  2. 2Semi-automated analysis of HER2 immunohistochemistry in invasive breast carcinoma using whole slide images: utility for interpretation in clinical practice2024
  3. 3IHC Profiler: An Open Source Plugin for the Quantitative Evaluation and Automated Scoring of Immunohistochemistry Images of Human Tissue Samples2014 · 1,377 citations
  4. 4Automated H-Scoring in Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer IHC : An Internal Validation Study2026
  5. 5Evaluation of AI-assisted HER2 scoring in breast carcinoma-stained whole-slide images.2024 · 1 citations