Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
This study investigates change over time in the level of hiring discrimination in US labor markets. We perform a meta-analysis of every available field experiment of hiring discrimination against African Americans or Latinos (n = 28). Together, these studies represent 55,842 applications submitted for 26,326 positions. We focus on trends since 1989 (n = 24 studies), when field experiments became more common and improved methodologically. Since 1989, whites receive on average 36% more callbacks than African Americans, and 24% more callbacks than Latinos. We observe no change in the level of hiring discrimination against African Americans over the past 25 years, although we find modest evidence of a decline in discrimination against Latinos. Accounting for applicant education, applicant gender, study method, occupational groups, and local labor market conditions does little to alter this result. Contrary to claims of declining discrimination in American society, our estimates suggest that levels of discrimination remain largely unchanged, at least at the point of hire.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Lincoln Quillian
Devah Pager
Ole Hexel
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Harvard University
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique
Northwestern University
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Quillian et al. (Tue,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69d74e7bf07a12db70b8a940 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1706255114
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: