PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
October 20, 2018SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología996 citationsOpen Access

The global burden of multiple chronic conditions: A narrative review

View Full Paper
CHCother HajatESEmma Stein

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Globally, approximately one in three of all adults suffer from multiple chronic conditions (MCCs). This review provides a comprehensive overview of the resulting epidemiological, economic and patient burden. There is no agreed taxonomy for MCCs, with several terms used interchangeably and no agreed definition, resulting in up to three-fold variation in prevalence rates: from 16% to 58% in UK studies, 26% in US studies and 9.4% in Urban South Asians. Certain conditions cluster together more frequently than expected, with associations of up to three-fold, e.g. depression associated with stroke and with Alzheimer's disease, and communicable conditions such as TB and HIV/AIDS associated with diabetes and CVD, respectively. Clusters are important as they may be highly amenable to large improvements in health and cost outcomes through relatively simple shifts in healthcare delivery. Healthcare expenditures greatly increase, sometimes exponentially, with each additional chronic condition with greater specialist physician access, emergency department presentations and hospital admissions. The patient burden includes a deterioration of quality of life, out of pocket expenses, medication adherence, inability to work, symptom control and a high toll on carers. This high burden from MCCs is further projected to increase. Recommendations for interventions include reaching consensus on the taxonomy of MCC, greater emphasis on MCCs research, primary prevention to achieve compression of morbidity, a shift of health systems and policies towards a multiple-condition framework, changes in healthcare payment mechanisms to facilitate this change and shifts in health and epidemiological databases to include MCCs.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Hajat et al. (2018) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d7cf1433ca018b39ae2e33https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmedr.2018.10.008
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Meta-Analysis: Glycosylated Hemoglobin and Cardiovascular Disease in Diabetes Mellitus2004 · 1,675 citations
  2. 2Risk of Hospitalized Stroke in Men Enrolled in the Honolulu Heart Program and the Framingham Study2002 · 197 citations
  3. 3Multiple Chronic Conditions in the United States2017 · 668 citations
  4. 4Chronic diseases and risk for depression in old age: A meta-analysis of published literature2009 · 419 citations
  5. 5Oncologists' recognition of depression in their patients with cancer.1998 · 591 citations