PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
August 1, 2013The Journal of Economic Perspectives1,907 citationsOpen Access

Income Inequality, Equality of Opportunity, and Intergenerational Mobility

MCMiles Corak

Key Points

  • The aim is to explore how rising income inequality influences intergenerational economic mobility in the U.S. compared to other countries.
  • Discussed evidence linking inequality with reduced intergenerational mobility.
  • Analyzed the impact of families, labor markets, and public policies on opportunities for children.
  • Highlighted cross-country comparisons and trends regarding mobility dynamics.
  • Countries with greater inequality show lower earnings mobility across generations.
  • The Great Gatsby Curve illustrates the inverse relationship between inequality and mobility.
  • Increased polarization in the labor market is likely to hinder mobility for future American generations without policy intervention.

Abstract

My focus is on the degree to which increasing inequality in the high-income countries, particularly in the United States, is likely to limit economic mobility for the next generation of young adults. I discuss the underlying drivers of opportunity that generate the relationship between inequality and intergenerational mobility. The goal is to explain why America differs from other countries, how intergenerational mobility will change in an era of higher inequality, and how the process is different for the top 1 percent. I begin by presenting evidence that countries with more inequality at one point in time also experience less earnings mobility across the generations, a relationship that has been called “The Great Gatsby Curve.” The interaction between families, labor markets, and public policies all structure a child's opportunities and determine the extent to which adult earnings are related to family background—but they do so in different ways across national contexts. Both cross-country comparisons and the underlying trends suggest that these drivers are all configured most likely to lower, or at least not raise, the degree of intergenerational earnings mobility for the next generation of Americans coming of age in a more polarized labor market. This trend will likely continue unless there are changes in public policy that promote the human capital of children in a way that offers relatively greater benefits to the relatively disadvantaged.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Miles Corak (2013) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d7eb6605ee2ba81dbee885https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.27.3.79
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper