PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 6, 2023Scientific Reports177 citationsOpen Access

ChatGPT’s inconsistent moral advice influences users’ judgment

View Full Paper
SKSebastian KrügelAOAndreas OstermaierMUMatthias Uhl

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

ChatGPT is not only fun to chat with, but it also searches information, answers questions, and gives advice. With consistent moral advice, it can improve the moral judgment and decisions of users. Unfortunately, ChatGPT's advice is not consistent. Nonetheless, it does influence users' moral judgment, we find in an experiment, even if they know they are advised by a chatting bot, and they underestimate how much they are influenced. Thus, ChatGPT corrupts rather than improves its users' moral judgment. While these findings call for better design of ChatGPT and similar bots, we also propose training to improve users' digital literacy as a remedy. Transparency, however, is not sufficient to enable the responsible use of AI.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Krügel et al. (2023) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69dbc54c50e1971baba3c99fhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-31341-0
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper