PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 13, 20260 citationsOpen Access

One View Is Not Enough: Engagement, Recognition and Presentation of Forensic Facial Depictions

EGE. GreenwayCWC. WilkinsonCFCharlie Frowd

Key Points

  • To determine if dynamic rotation improves recognition of forensic facial depictions compared to static views.
  • Conducted two psychological experiments on facial depiction recognition.
  • Compared static multi-view polyptychs with dynamic rotation sequences.
  • Measured correct naming responses and overall accuracy using mixed models.
  • Dynamic presentation showed no overall improvement in naming accuracy.
  • Repeated exposure to dynamic images significantly improved naming accuracy.
  • Static pentaptychs slightly improved naming and significantly enhanced accuracy compared to dynamic rotation.

Abstract

Purpose To assess whether dynamic rotation enhances the recognition of forensic facial depiction compared to traditional multi-view static (polyptych) presentation, and to examine how viewpoint availability and repeat exposure influence identification outcomes. Design/methodology/approach Two psychological experiments compared the recognition of facial depictions presented either as (i) multi-view static polyptychs—either (three-view) triptychs or (five-view) pentaptychs—or (ii) 16-second dynamic rotations (animated GIFs).Recognition was measured using correct and incorrect naming responses from participants and a combined naming-accuracy index. Generalised Linear Mixed Models were used to evaluate the effect of presentation format while accounting for variation across participants and stimuli. Findings Experiment 1 involved facial depictions presented as static triptych (three views: front view plus two side profiles) and dynamic-view rotation. Dynamic presentation did not significantly improve correct naming overall. However, when faces were viewed twice, dynamic presentation produced significantly higher correct naming and overall accuracy relative to static presentation. In Experiment 2, two three-quarter profiles were added to the static condition to give a static (five-view) pentaptych. These pentaptychs now slightly increased correct naming and significantly improved accuracy compared with dynamic rotation. Repeated exposure provided modest identification benefits but was also associated with some increase in mistaken names. Overall, static three-quarter viewpoints enhanced recognition, while dynamic motion was thought to mainly increase engagement and to provide recognition gains under repeated viewing when there is a limited number of fixed views available. Originality This study offers the first direct empirical comparison of static multi-view and dynamic rotational facial depictions in a forensic context, demonstrating distinct recognition outcomes and informing evidence-based display practice. Practical Implications For the presentation of forensic facial depiction to stimulate recognition, results suggest that increasing the number of viewpoints is more effective than motion for promoting accurate recognition, although dynamic presentation may be useful when repeating exposure of limited (front-and-side view) perspectives.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Greenway et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69dc88f43afacbeac03eabe6https://doi.org/10.1108/jfp-12-2025-0113
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Dynamic presentation in 3D modulates face similarity judgements: a human-aligned encoding model approach2026
  2. 2Dynamic presentation in 3D modulates face similarity judgments – A human-aligned encoding model approach2025
  3. 3PORTRAYALS IN VISUAL ADVERTISING: EVIDENCE FROM AN EYE TRACKING2025
  4. 4Two-dimensional vs three-dimensional facial visualization: effects on perceived attractiveness, treatment need, and modality selection across sagittal and vertical facial patterns2026
  5. 5The view-tolerance of human identity recognition depends on horizontal face information.2025