PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 2, 2017Clinical Cancer Research254 citationsOpen Access

Early Evaluation of Circulating Tumor DNA as Marker of Therapeutic Efficacy in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients (PLACOL Study)

FGFanny GarlanPLPierre Laurent‐PuigDSDavid Sefrioui

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Purpose: Markers of chemotherapy efficacy in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) are essential for optimization of treatment strategies. We evaluated the applicability of early changes in circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) as a marker of therapeutic efficacy.Experimental Design: This prospective study enrolled consecutive patients with mCRC receiving a first- or second-line chemotherapy. CtDNA was assessed in plasma collected before the first (C0), second (C1) and/or third (C2) chemotherapy cycle, using picodroplet-digital PCR assays based either on detection of gene mutation (KRAS, BRAF, TP53) or hypermethylation (WIF1, NPY). CT scans were centrally assessed using RECIST v1.1 criteria. Multivariate analyses were adjusted on age, gender, ECOG performance status (PS), metastatic synchronicity, and treatment line.Results: Eighty-two patients with mCRC treated in first- (82.9%) or second- (17.1%) line chemotherapy were included. Patients with a high (>10 ng/mL) versus low (≤0.1 ng/mL) ctDNA concentration at C0 had a shorter overall survival (OS; 6.8 vs. 33.4 months: adjusted HR, 5.64; 95% CI, 2.5-12.6; P 0 and C2 or C1 (C2or1), we classified the patients in two groups (named "good" or "bad ctDNA responders"). In multivariate analysis, patients belonging to the group called "good ctDNA responder" (n = 58) versus "bad ctDNA responder" (n = 15) had a better objective response rate (P P P Conclusions: This study suggests that early change in ctDNA concentration is a marker of therapeutic efficacy in patients with mCRC. Clin Cancer Res; 23(18); 5416-25. ©2017 AACR.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Garlan et al. (2017) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69dd39680a7b4bc8c4100fe6https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-16-3155
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Carcinoembryonic Antigen Surge in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients Responding to Oxaliplatin Combination Chemotherapy: Implications for Tumor Marker Monitoring and Guidelines2003 · 70 citations
  2. 2Aberrant methylation of NPY, PENK, and WIF1 as a promising marker for blood-based diagnosis of colorectal cancer2013 · 185 citations
  3. 3Adequate sample size for developing prediction models is not simply related to events per variable2016 · 544 citations
  4. 4Clonal evolution and resistance to EGFR blockade in the blood of colorectal cancer patients2015 · 1,109 citations
  5. 5Clinical Relevance of KRAS -Mutated Subclones Detected with Picodroplet Digital PCR in Advanced Colorectal Cancer Treated with Anti-EGFR Therapy2014 · 163 citations