PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 14, 2016320 citations

Efficient Subgraph Matching by Postponing Cartesian Products

View Full Paper
FBFei BiLCLijun ChangXLXuemin Lin

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

In this paper, we study the problem of subgraph matching that extracts all subgraph isomorphic embeddings of a query graph q in a large data graph G. The existing algorithms for subgraph matching follow Ullmann's backtracking approach; that is, iteratively map query vertices to data vertices by following a matching order of query vertices. It has been shown that the matching order of query vertices is a very important aspect to the efficiency of a subgraph matching algorithm. Recently, many advanced techniques, such as enforcing connectivity and merging similar vertices in query or data graphs, have been proposed to provide an effective matching order with the aim to reduce unpromising intermediate results especially the ones caused by redundant Cartesian products. In this paper, for the first time we address the issue of unpromising results by Cartesian products from "dissimilar" vertices. We propose a new framework by postponing the Cartesian products based on the structure of a query to minimize the redundant Cartesian products. Our second contribution is proposing a new path-based auxiliary data structure, with the size O (|E (G) | x |V (q) |), to generate a matching order and conduct subgraph matching, which significantly reduces the exponential size O (|V (G) ||V (q) |-1) of the existing path-based auxiliary data structure, where V (G) and E (G) are the vertex and edge sets of a data graph G, respectively, and V (q) is the vertex set of a query q. Extensive empirical studies on real and synthetic graphs demonstrate that our techniques outperform the state-of-the-art algorithms by up to 3 orders of magnitude.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Bi et al. (2016) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69dd4b217d97b7e86940ca3bhttps://doi.org/10.1145/2882903.2915236
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper