Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
In clinical trials with sequential patient entry, fixed sample size designs are unjustified on ethical grounds and sequential designs are often impracticable. One solution is a group sequential design dividing patient entry into a number of equal-sized groups so that the decision to stop the trial or continue is based on repeated significance tests of the accumulated data after each group is evaluated. Exact results are obtained for a trial with two treatments and a normal response with known variance. The design problem of determining the required size and number of groups is also considered. Simulation shows that these normal results may be adapted to other types of response data. An example shows that group sequential designs can sometimes be statistically superior to standard sequential designs.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Stuart Pocock
Biometrika
University of Edinburgh
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Stuart Pocock (Mon,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69dd5ed8fb7610310c10293a — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/64.2.191
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: