PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 5, 2015Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology210 citations

Tweets as impact indicators: Examining the implications of automated “bot” accounts on Twitter

View Full Paper
SHStefanie HausteinTBTimothy D. BowmanKHKim Holmberg

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

This brief communication presents preliminary findings on automated T witter accounts distributing links to scientific articles deposited on the preprint repository ar X iv. It discusses the implication of the presence of such bots from the perspective of social media metrics (altmetrics), where mentions of scholarly documents on T witter have been suggested as a means of measuring impact that is both broader and timelier than citations. Our results show that automated T witter accounts create a considerable amount of tweets to scientific articles and that they behave differently than common social bots, which has critical implications for the use of raw tweet counts in research evaluation and assessment. We discuss some definitions of T witter cyborgs and bots in scholarly communication and propose distinguishing between different levels of engagement—that is, differentiating between tweeting only bibliographic information to discussing or commenting on the content of a scientific work.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Haustein et al. (2015) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69de9f6240ea065679558dbbhttps://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23456
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper