PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 18, 2026Sustainability1 citationsOpen Access

A Qualitative Study on Postgraduate Social Entrepreneurship Students’ Experiences with and Perceptions of AI-Augmented Creativity in Sustainable Startup Development

View Full Paper
XLXiuhuo LiJBJongbok Byun

Key Points

  • The study aims to explore postgraduate social entrepreneurship students’ experiences with AI during sustainable startup development.
  • Qualitative study design using semi-structured interviews
  • AI-assisted ideation task for data collection
  • Reflexive thematic analysis for data interpretation
  • Generative AI supports information access and associative thinking but lacks human intuition
  • Intrinsic motivation is primarily driven by personal values, not AI
  • AI is viewed as a tool, not a collaborator, with superficial emotional implications
  • A trade-off is perceived between efficiency and creativity in AI-assisted ideation

Abstract

Generative artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly integrated into sustainability-oriented entrepreneurial practices, raising important questions about its role in shaping human creativity and innovation. This qualitative study examines how postgraduate social entrepreneurship students engage with generative AI during the creativity phase of sustainable startup development. Drawing on Amabile’s componential theory of creativity, this study explores how AI is perceived to relate to domain-relevant skills, creativity-relevant processes, task motivation, and social–contextual factors. Data were collected through an AI-assisted ideation task, followed by semi-structured interviews, and analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis. The findings reveal that generative AI was perceived as supporting information access and associative thinking, while being unable to replicate human intuition and the “aha” moment associated with deep creativity. Moreover, AI was perceived to have limited influence on intrinsic motivation, which remains driven by personal values and contextual responsibility. Socially, AI was consistently described as a tool rather than a teammate, with emotional responses regarded as superficial. The study further suggests that AI may be understood as a social–contextual condition and highlights a perceived trade-off between efficiency and creativity in AI-assisted ideation. These insights extend the application of creativity theory to AI-supported sustainability contexts and offer practical implications for fostering responsible, human-centered innovation in entrepreneurship education.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Li et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69e31ff140886becb653f07ehttps://doi.org/10.3390/su18083979
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Generative AI as a Collaborative Partner in Entrepreneurial Creativity: A Conceptual Framework2026 · 1 citations
  2. 2Artificial Intelligence and Student Creativity: An Exploratory Study of Students’ Experiences with AI Tools2026 · 2 citations
  3. 3Can artificial intelligence support creativity in early design processes?2024 · 119 citations
  4. 4Unleashing Human Creative Potential in the Age of Artificial Intelligence: An Academic Perspective2025
  5. 5From Augmentation to Innovation: Examining the Role of AI Tools in Student-Centered Creative Learning in Egypt2026