PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 18, 2026BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making0 citationsOpen Access

Towards a clinical decision protocol for therapeutic plasma exchange based on biomarker patterns and machine learning

NSNicoleta SgăvârdeaDODarian OnchişFGFabian Galis

Key Points

  • To create a decision-making protocol for therapeutic plasma exchange guided by biomarker patterns and machine learning.
  • Analyzed data from ICU cases of COVID-19 and non-COVID patients receiving therapeutic plasma exchange.
  • Developed decision trees based on biochemical improvements and inflammatory markers.
  • Conducted apriori analysis to find patterns linking IL-6 and LDH levels with treatment response.
  • Constructed a unified four-tier clinical algorithm for patient stratification.
  • Identified specific phenotypes with favorable responses to therapeutic plasma exchange based on IL-6 and LDH thresholds.
  • Developed an interpretable machine learning framework for clinical decision-making.
  • Designed a protocol aligned with existing practices for severe COVID-19 treatment, emphasizing biomarker patterns.

Abstract

Therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) is increasingly used as an adjunctive intervention in severe, hyperinflammatory critical illness, including COVID-19, yet clinical guidance remains syndromic and evidence is heterogeneous. We present an integrated, interpretable machine-learning framework designed to support protocolizable TPE decision-making by identifying biochemical phenotypes associated with short-horizon laboratory response to TPE. Our dataset consists of real-world intensive care unit cases and captures the treatment heterogeneity and operational constraints that a workable institutional protocol must accommodate, being well-suited as a “protocol seed” for iterative validation. We jointly analyze a COVID-19 cohort and a non-COVID comparator cohort receiving TPE. Three decision trees were constructed to represent: (1) global biochemical improvement, (2) strict improvement dependent on key inflammatory/coagulation markers, and (3) early interleukin-6 (IL-6) response. The models revealed distinct favorable phenotypes—particularly patients with IL-6 > 86 pg/mL, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) >346 U/L, lymphopenia, and fibrinogen ≤ 8.3 g/L. Apriori analysis further identified high-confidence patterns linking high values of IL-6 and LDH with TPE responsiveness. We constructed a unified four-tier clinical algorithm for candidate stratification. The resulting logic aligns with how TPE has been applied in practice in published severe COVID-19 series and trials, where candidate selection typically targets cytokine release syndrome-like phenotypes, organ dysfunction, and hyperinflammatory biomarker profiles. We further contextualize these findings against American Society for Apheresis guidance and COVID-era operational considerations, demonstrating convergence while adding quantitative biomarker thresholds. These findings support two complementary perspectives of benefit: (i) an algorithmic framework that provides transparent, protocol-ready guidelines, and (ii) a phenotype-based clinical approach consistent with observed post-TPE marker changes in severe COVID-19 cases. Larger multicenter validation is warranted; however, the present work provides a practical foundation for protocol construction and auditable decision support in settings already performing TPE.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Sgăvârdea et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69e320af40886becb653fbb9https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-026-03484-3
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper