PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 19, 2026AI & Society0 citationsOpen Access

Managing the ethical risks of AI in intelligence: a multi-layered framework

RBRoss Bellaby

Key Points

  • The aim is to create an ethical framework for assessing the use of AI in intelligence that focuses on harms to privacy and autonomy.
  • Developed a multi-level harm-threat framework
  • Evaluated ethical permissibility linked to harm severity and threat characteristics
  • Examined AI's role in data collection and predictive modeling within the intelligence cycle
  • Outlined how AI can intensify intrusions into privacy
  • Demonstrated the need for ethical assessment of algorithmic information
  • Provided an operational logic for ethical decision-making in intelligence.

Abstract

Abstract This article develops a context-sensitive multi-level harm–threat ethical framework for assessing the permissibility of artificial intelligence (AI) in intelligence operations, with particular focus on harms to privacy and autonomy. AI offers unprecedented capabilities in data collection, analysis, and predictive modeling, enabling more efficient and effective detection and prevention of threats. At the same time, its use in intelligence contexts intensifies the scale, depth, and persistence of intrusions, while reshaping how intelligence operatives understand their roles, judgements, and reliance on algorithmically generated information. The ethical challenge, therefore, is not whether intelligence-AI causes harm, but how such harm can be morally assessed, constrained, and justified throughout the process. This paper addresses this challenge by developing a multi-level harm–threat framework that evaluates ethical permissibility by systematically linking the degree of harm imposed to the severity, proximity, evidentiary strength, and target liability of the anticipated threat. Embedded within the intelligence cycle, the framework captures how AI-driven collection, processing, analysis, and implementation progressively intensify intrusion through profiling and prediction. The paper’s contribution lies in translating normative ethical reasoning into an operational justificatory logic that guides intelligence decision-making without normalizing ambient or disproportionate surveillance.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Ross Bellaby (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69e47250010ef96374d8e697https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-026-03045-2
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Freedom of the Will and the Concept of a Person1971 · 4,445 citations
  2. 2Privacy: Its Constitution and Vicissitudes1966 · 103 citations
  3. 3Killing Civilians2005 · 9 citations
  4. 4Killing in Self-Defence2006 · 74 citations
  5. 5Detecting terrorist influencers using reciprocal human-machine learning: The case of militant Jihadist Da’wa on the Darknet2024 · 4 citations