PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 27, 2026Transportation Research Part A Policy and Practice2 citationsOpen Access

Integrated planning of vertiports and vertipads infrastructure for Urban Air Mobility

View Full Paper
NLNing LyuTFTao Feng

Key Points

  • The study aims to develop a framework for optimizing vertiport locations and vertipad capacities in Urban Air Mobility.
  • Developed an integrated optimization framework to determine vertiport locations and vertipad capacities.
  • Utilized multinomial logit formulation for UAM demand estimation and multi-server queuing theory for passenger waiting times.
  • Employed a Lagrangian relaxation approach combined with Benders decomposition to solve the nonlinear programming problem.
  • UAM adoption driven more by service quality than network size; average waiting time and ground access disutility were dominant factors.
  • Demand-side uncertainty affects vertipad capacity more than vertiport locations, with optimal flight demand peaking around 20 km.
  • Expanding vertipad limits shows diminishing returns beyond 2-3 vertipads, indicating the need to balance service quality and cost.

Abstract

Urban Air Mobility (UAM) has emerged as a promising mobility option for intra-city, inter-city, and regional trips. However, studies on its critical infrastructure planning (i.e., vertiport and vertipad) often ignore demand heterogeneity and rely on uniform configurations that risk overinvestment. To address this limitation, we develop an integrated optimization framework that jointly determines vertiport locations and vertipad capacities under infrastructure cost, capacity, and demand constraints. The model integrates a multinomial logit formulation to estimate UAM demand with multi-server queuing theory to capture passenger waiting times at vertiports. To solve the resulting nonlinear programming problem, we employ a Lagrangian relaxation approach combined with Benders decomposition. Empirical results from a high-density area in Shanghai show that UAM adoption is driven more by service quality than by network size. Average waiting time and ground access disutility are the dominant determinants: overly strict vertiport service-distance requirements can render deployment infeasible, whereas relaxing them reduces investment but lowers adoption. Sensitivity analyses further indicate that demand-side uncertainty (value of time and public acceptance) primarily affects required vertipad capacity rather than vertiport locations. In addition, flight demand peaks around 20 km, and expanding per-site vertipad limits yields diminishing returns beyond 2–3 vertipads. Overall, these findings suggest that effective UAM planning depends more on meeting passenger expectations than on large-scale infrastructure expansion. The proposed approach offers planners a scalable and practical tool for balancing service quality and cost, ensuring that early-stage UAM deployment avoids overbuilding and remains financially sustainable.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Lyu et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69eefcaefede9185760d39e1https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2026.105027
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper