PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 27, 2026Basin Research0 citationsOpen Access

Shifting the Paradigm: Redefining the Chronostratigraphy of the Triassic Rewan Group, Bowen Basin, Australia

View Full Paper
MSMatthew ScipioneRVRomain VaucherEREric Roberts

Key Points

  • The research aims to establish a robust chronostratigraphic framework for the Triassic Rewan Group by integrating detailed lithostratigraphic analysis with high-density U-Pb detrital-zircon geochronology.
  • Coupled lithostratigraphic analysis with U-Pb detrital-zircon geochronology using LA-ICP-MS with ca. 300 analyses per sandstone.
  • Calibrated analyses against latest Permian tuff reference horizons.
  • Compared maximum depositional age metrics for more accurate chronostratigraphic estimates.
  • The chronostratigraphy of the Rewan Group spans ca. 250–233 Ma (Olenekian to Carnian).
  • Evidence of a hiatus or condensed interval of at least ca. 12–15 Myr in the Denison Trough.
  • Revised dates for vertebrate assemblages indicate they date to late Ladinian to early Carnian rather than earliest Triassic.

Abstract

ABSTRACT The Triassic Rewan Group in the northern Bowen Basin, Queensland, Australia preserves a key record of terrestrial environments and faunas that have been assumed to document recovery following the end‐Permian mass extinction (EPME). The Rewan Group, consisting of the Sagittarius Sandstone and the Arcadia Formation, accumulated in a retroarc foreland basin during the Hunter–Bowen Orogeny, but its chronostratigraphy has remained poorly constrained because previous age models relied mainly on limited, geographically restricted biostratigraphy (esp. palynostratigraphy). Here, we couple detailed lithostratigraphic analysis with high‐density U–Pb detrital‐zircon (DZ) geochronology by LA‐ICP‐MS (ca. 300 analyses per sandstone), calibrated against latest Permian (ca. 252–251 Ma) tuff and tuffaceous reference horizons, and a detrital apatite U–Pb dataset, to establish a robust chronostratigraphic framework for the Sagittarius Sandstone and Arcadia Formation. We compare several maximum depositional age (MDA) metrics and show that maximum‐likelihood ages (MLA) at 10% discordance provide a stratigraphically coherent MDA estimate, with younger single‐grain and cluster‐based estimators used as internal checks and minimum bounds. Preferential zircon picking further shows that targeted grain selection enriches the youngest Triassic populations, strengthening the robustness of the resulting MDA constraints. The resulting MDAs demonstrate that the Rewan Group spans ca. 250–233 Ma (Olenekian to Carnian) and that the lower Rewan Group contact is strongly time‐transgressive. In the Taroom Trough (foredeep), fluvial successions show an overall up‐section younging from the latest Permian reference ages through Olenekian–Anisian Sagittarius Sandstone into the late Ladinian–earliest Carnian Arcadia Formation (based on sandstone MDAs). In contrast, in the Denison Trough (back‐bulge), the latest Permian coal measures are directly overlain by Middle–early Late Triassic Rewan Group deposits, implying a hiatus or condensed interval of at least ca. 12–15 Myr based on MDAs. We show that known Arcadia Formation vertebrate fossil‐bearing horizons are late Ladinian (239 Ma) to early Carnian (236 Ma) rather than earliest Triassic, with the younger date also corroborated by a detrital apatite lower‐intercept age of ca. 239 Ma. These revised ages show that the Arcadia Formation vertebrate assemblages do not come from the immediate post‐EPME interval but from the late Ladinian to early Carnian, across the onset of the Carnian Pluvial Episode.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Scipione et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69eefd64fede9185760d406dhttps://doi.org/10.1111/bre.70102
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper