PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 6, 20260 citationsOpen Access

Effect of Cow Bone Ash on A Stabilized Lateritic Soil for Road Work

View Full Paper
AKAbdulrauf Toyin KURANGASSSulaiman Olayinka SUBAIRHSHabeeb Solihu

Key Points

  • This research aims to evaluate cow bone ash as a stabilizer to enhance the geotechnical properties of lateritic soil for road construction while addressing environmental pollution.
  • Collected lateritic soil samples from Peke Airport Road.
  • Stabilized soil with varying percentages of cow bone ash (0%-10%).
  • Conducted standard laboratory tests including specific gravity, Atterberg limits, compaction, and California Bearing Ratio.
  • Unsoaked and soaked California Bearing Ratio increased from 51.0% to 57.0% with 10% cow bone ash.
  • Atterberg limits showed a reduction in liquid limit from 44.5% to 30.0% with 10% cow bone ash.
  • Maximum dry density increased from 1660 kg/m³ to 1770 kg/m³ with 10% cow bone ash.

Abstract

This research investigates the potential of cow bone ash (CBA) as a stabilizer for lateritic soil, aiming to improve its geotechnical properties for road construction and mitigate environmental pollution from bone waste disposal. Lateritic soil samples were collected from Peke Airport Road and stabilized with varying percentages of CBA (0%, 2%, 4%, 6%, 8%, and 10%). Standard laboratory tests, including specific gravity, particle size distribution, Atterberg limits, compaction, and California Bearing Ratio (CBR), were conducted according to British Standards (BS 1377: 1990 and BS 1924: 1990). demonstrating improved geotechnical properties such as increased unsoaked and soaked CBR values (from 51.0% to 57.0% with 10% CBA), reduced Atterberg limits (LL decreased from 44.5% to 30.0% with 10% CBA), and enhanced compaction characteristics (MDD increased from 1660 kg/m³ to 1770 kg/m³ with 10% CBA), while also considering the trade-off of increased optimum moisture content (OMC) from 12.0% to 17.5% with increasing CBA content, necessitating further analysis to determine the optimal CBA percentage for optimal stabilization.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

KURANGA et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69fadaab03f892aec9b1e57bhttps://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20028828
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1CORN-COB ASH AS PARTIAL REPLACEMENT OF CEMENT FOR STABILIZATION OF LATERITE SOIL2024 · 3 citations
  2. 2Synergestic effect of rice husk ash blended with cement on the stabilization of lateritic soil for road construction2025
  3. 3Experimental Investigation of the Strength Characteristics of Lateritic Soil Stabilized with Sawdust Ash and Plantain Peel Ash2026
  4. 4Influence of Calcium Carbide Residue on Corn Stalk Ash Stabilized Lateritic Soil for Highway Pavement Construction2024 · 2 citations
  5. 5Advancing geotechnical engineering via sustainable biomass-based soil stabilization2025