Heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC) systems struggle to maintain optimal thermal comfort because perception is subjective and varies significantly across individuals. Traditional uniform cooling strategies often overlook demographic diversity, leading to inequitable comfort outcomes and inefficient building operations. To address this limitation, this study analyzed a web-based survey of 366 university occupants using a partial proportional odds model with multiple imputation and inverse-frequency weighting. Interaction terms, specifically Age–Activity, Gender–Clothing, and Age–Clothing, were included to assess combined effects that reflect demographic disparities in adaptive capacity. The results show that clothing insulation, activity, age, gender, race/ethnicity, and space type significantly influence thermal responses. Notably, male occupants were more than three times as likely to report feeling too warm (odds ratio OR = 3.24), whereas older adults exhibited significantly lower odds of reporting feeling too warm (OR = 0.42). Substantial variation was observed across racial and ethnic groups (ORs ranging from 2.4 to 6.5). These findings highlight the limitations of traditional population-average comfort approaches and provide valuable scientific insights for demand-response-ready HVAC strategies that adjust temperature setpoints dynamically without sacrificing comfort. By offering accurate, real-time estimates across diverse thermal ranges, these occupant-centric models reduce HVAC energy use and associated emissions at the building scale while supporting ancillary services for flexible load shifting and smarter coordination within low-carbon electric grids. Ultimately, incorporating demographic and contextual diversity into building controls reduces unnecessary cooling waste while promoting thermal equity, establishing a human-centric foundation for sustainable built environments.
Makhmalbaf et al. (2026) studied this question.