PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 7, 2026Water Resources Research0 citationsOpen Access

Strategies for Predicting Flood Inundation in a Large and Complex Floodplain Based on Low‐Fidelity Hydrodynamic Models

View Full Paper
WWWen WangQWQuan J. WangRNRory Nathan

Key Points

  • The research aims to evaluate the feasibility of low-fidelity models for predicting flood inundation in complex environments.
  • Investigation of LSG model variants (LSG-Max and LSG-TS) in flood modeling
  • Application to the Lower Brisbane River floodplain under challenging conditions
  • Evaluation against historical and synthetic flood events
  • Limited accuracy noted initially with LSG model
  • Higher low-fidelity resolution improved model performance
  • LSG-TS consistently outperformed LSG-Max in flood prediction

Abstract

Abstract Accurate and computationally efficient flood inundation prediction is critical for effective flood risk management. While high‐fidelity hydrodynamic models provide detailed representations of flood processes, their computational demands limit real‐time flood forecasting or ensemble applications. To address this, surrogate models have been developed to deliver faster predictions with acceptable accuracy. Among them, the Low‐Fidelity, Spatial Analysis and Gaussian Process Learning (LSG) model has demonstrated superior performance with reasonable computational cost, effectively simulating flood dynamics in complex floodplains. However, its ability to handle large‐scale floodplains with intricate flow interactions and upstream dam releases remains untested. This study investigates the feasibility of applying the LSG model to the Lower Brisbane River floodplain, which presents additional challenges due to extensive urbanization, dam regulation, tidal influences, and many interacting tributaries. These conditions lead to backwater effects from the main river channel into the tributaries, further complicating flood behavior. Initial implementation in this study exhibited limited accuracy, prompting further investigation. Higher low‐fidelity resolution was found to significantly improve model performance. To predict maximum flood surfaces, we developed and investigated two LSG model variants: (a) LSG‐Max trained directly on maximum flood surfaces; (b) LSG‐TS trained on time series data and deriving maximum flood surfaces from the predicted flood evolution. Evaluation against historical and synthetic flood events showed that LSG‐TS consistently outperforms LSG‐Max due to its richer training information. These findings demonstrate that the LSG modeling approach can offer effective strategies for predicting flood inundation in large and complex floodplains.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Wang et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69fbefc0164b5133a91a3d2bhttps://doi.org/10.1029/2025wr042481
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Real time probabilistic inundation forecasts using a LSTM neural network2024 · 23 citations
  2. 2Principal component analysis: a review and recent developments2016 · 9,957 citations
  3. 3Gaussian process regression on multiple drivers and attributes for rapid prediction of maximum flood inundation extent and depth2024 · 16 citations
  4. 4HydroTest: A web-based toolbox of evaluation metrics for the standardised assessment of hydrological forecasts2006 · 519 citations
  5. 5Review of surrogate modeling in water resources2012 · 997 citations