PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 7, 2026Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology0 citationsOpen Access

Electrical Source Imaging in Stereoelectroencephalography: A Proof-of-Concept Study

View Full Paper
LBLuca BosisioMCMatteo CataldiDTDomenico Tortora

Key Points

  • This study aims to assess the accuracy of electrical source imaging (ESI) using stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG) recordings for localizing brain activity.
  • Compared three inverse solution methods: sLORETA, minimum norm estimate, dynamic statistical parametric mapping.
  • Evaluated 12 subjects undergoing SEEG to localize stimulation artifacts.
  • Measured localization accuracy as Euclidean distance from stimulation site to estimated source peak.
  • sLORETA showed the highest localization accuracy with a mean error of 11.65 mm for single stimuli.
  • Mean localization error improved to 9.28 mm when averaging 10 stimuli, achieving subcentimeter accuracy in 77.5% of trials.
  • The accuracy of sLORETA remained high and was less affected by the distance from the nearest SEEG contact.

Abstract

Purpose: Electrical source imaging (ESI) estimates the intracerebral generators of EEG signals. Although traditionally applied to scalp EEG sensors, recent studies suggested its potential applicability to intracerebral recordings. We systematically evaluated the localization accuracy of ESI applied to SEEG data rather than scalp EEG. Methods: We compared three different inverse solution methods (standardized low-resolution electromagnetic tomography sLORETA, minimum norm estimate, and dynamic statistical parametric mapping) in localizing the stimulation artifact in 12 subjects undergoing SEEG. Localization accuracy was defined as the Euclidean distance between the stimulation site and the peak of the estimated source. Results: Standardized low-resolution electromagnetic tomography showed the highest accuracy. For single stimuli, the mean localization error was 11.65 mm, improving to 9.28 mm when averaging 10 stimuli. Subcentimeter accuracy was achieved in 77.5% of averaged trials. Although localization based on the maximum amplitude artifact increased linearly with the distance from the nearest SEEG contact, sLORETA maintained higher accuracy, typically within ∼1 cm. The weak association between sLORETA error and sensor distance disappeared when excluding stimulations at the outermost boundaries of the explored region. Conclusions: These results support the application of ESI to SEEG data for accurate source localization. Among tested methods, sLORETA was the most effective and may improve spatial interpretability in challenging epilepsy cases, including those with suboptimal spatial sampling.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Bosisio et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69fc2c1f8b49bacb8b347ccbhttps://doi.org/10.1097/wnp.0000000000001257
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Combining independent component analysis and source localization for improving spatial sampling of stereoelectroencephalography in epilepsy2024 · 11 citations
  2. 2Epileptogenicity of brain structures in human temporal lobe epilepsy: a quantified study from intracerebral EEG2008 · 662 citations
  3. 3Comparison of noise-normalized minimum norm estimates for MEG analysis using multiple resolution metrics2010 · 207 citations
  4. 4SEEG assistant: a 3DSlicer extension to support epilepsy surgery2017 · 97 citations
  5. 5Diagnostic added value of electrical source imaging in presurgical evaluation of patients with epilepsy: A prospective study2019 · 66 citations