PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 7, 2026Sensors0 citationsOpen Access

A Scene Detection Complexity Metric for Infrared Small Target Detection

View Full Paper
ZHZhiyuan HuangZZZhiyong Zhang

Key Points

  • This study aims to create a unified metric to quantify the difficulty of detecting small infrared targets across various scene complexities.
  • Six basic indicators are selected based on target saliency, background complexity, and target-background coupling.
  • Objective weights for the indicators are determined using entropy weight method and principal component analysis.
  • The proposed metric is validated using 100 test images from multiple datasets.
  • The scene detection complexity (SDC) metric shows a Pearson linear correlation coefficient of 0.956 with subjective difficulty ratings.
  • The SDC has a correlation of -0.902 with image-level detection scores from seven algorithms.
  • Deep learning methods show greater robustness in complex backgrounds compared to traditional methods.

Abstract

Infrared small target detection is widely used in aerospace surveillance, maritime search and rescue, and military reconnaissance. However, the performance of detection algorithms is highly dependent on scene characteristics, and methods that perform well in simple backgrounds may degrade substantially in complex environments. Existing indicators, such as information entropy, average gradient, and peak signal-to-noise ratio, can reflect detection difficulty from individual perspectives, but they do not provide a unified measure that jointly considers target saliency, background complexity, and target–background coupling. To address this issue, this study proposes a scene detection complexity (SDC) metric for quantifying the difficulty of infrared small target detection. Six basic indicators are selected from three dimensions, namely target saliency, background complexity, and target–background coupling: statistical variance, target–background contrast, signal-to-clutter ratio, information entropy, structural similarity, and target size. After Min–Max normalization, objective weights are determined by combining the entropy weight method and principal component analysis, and the weighted indicators are fused into an SDC value in the range of 0,1. Experiments on 100 test images selected from IRST640, MSISTD, SIRST-V2, and an infrared small-aircraft sequence dataset show that the proposed SDC achieves a Pearson linear correlation coefficient of 0.956 with subjective difficulty ratings and −0.902 with image-level detection scores obtained from seven representative algorithms. The results further indicate that traditional methods are more sensitive to increasing scene complexity, whereas deep-learning-based methods are comparatively more robust in complex backgrounds. The proposed SDC provides a unified and objective tool for performance evaluation, algorithm selection, and pre-assessment of scene difficulty in infrared small target detection.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Huang et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69fc2c4b8b49bacb8b347d02https://doi.org/10.3390/s26092886
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1A Decoupled Separation, Enhancement, and Purification Framework for Infrared Moving Target Detection in Low-Altitude Remote Sensing2026
  2. 2Infrared small target detection based on local significance and multiscale2024 · 12 citations
  3. 3Fast infrared small target detection based on weighted double dilation strengthened mechanism2026
  4. 4Hardware-Accelerated Infrared Small Target Recognition Based on Energy-Weighted Local Uncertainty Measure2024
  5. 5Dual-Structure Elements Morphological Filtering and Local Z-Score Normalization for Infrared Small Target Detection against Heavy Clouds2024 · 35 citations