PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 8, 2026The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine0 citationsOpen Access

Assisted reproductive technology and birth defects: analysis of the mediating pathways in twin pregnancies

View Full Paper
FHFengjiao HuHZHuiyuan ZhuJFJunqun Fang

Key Points

  • This research aims to assess the link between assisted reproductive technology (ART) and birth defects, focusing on twin pregnancies.
  • Conducted a retrospective study using data from Hunan Province, China, during 2023-2024.
  • Used multivariable logistic regression to analyze birth defect associations between ART-conceived and naturally-conceived pregnancies.
  • Performed mediation analysis to determine the role of twin pregnancies in the ART-birth defect relationship.
  • ART significantly increases birth defect risk (p=0.007).
  • Twin pregnancies accounted for 14.33% of the overall impact of ART on birth defects.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To systematically evaluate the epidemiological association between ART and the risk of birth defects. METHODS: Based on the latest provincial monitoring data from a large sample in Hunan Province, China for the period 2023-2024, we conducted a retrospective study comparing baseline characteristics between ART-conceived and naturally-conceived pregnancies. Through multivariable logistic regression, we estimated ART-birth defect associations, with interaction analyses across key subgroups. Besides, we performed mediation analysis to quantify twin pregnancy's role in the ART-birth defect relationship. RESULTS: = 0.007) had significant interaction effects on the association between ART and birth defects. In addition, in the mediation analysis, twin pregnancies could explain 14.33% of the relative impact of ART on birth defects. CONCLUSIONS: This study has found that the use of ART increases the risk of birth defects. In the association between ART and birth defects, twin pregnancies accounted for 14.33%.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Hu et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69fd7d94bfa21ec5bbf05fc1https://doi.org/10.1080/14767058.2026.2658942
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Prospective risk of stillbirth and neonatal complications in twin pregnancies: systematic review and meta-analysis2016 · 292 citations
  2. 2Congenital anomalies in offspring of subfertile couples: a registry-based study in the northern Netherlands2015 · 42 citations
  3. 3Integrated multi-omics reveal epigenomic disturbance of assisted reproductive technologies in human offspring2020 · 112 citations
  4. 4The Differences of Population Birth Defects in Epidemiology Analysis between the Rural and Urban Areas of Hunan Province in China, 2014–20182021 · 8 citations
  5. 5Analysis of birth defects among children 3 years after conception through assisted reproductive technology in China2013 · 23 citations