PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 8, 2026The Australian Journal of Language and Literacy1 citationsOpen Access

Storytelling and literacy practices in community - bringing together place, people and texts

OBOndine BradburyKCKelly Carabott

Key Points

  • The aim is to explore how storytelling and literacy practices are enacted through relationships among schools, families, and communities.
  • Conducted a scoping review of 14 studies published between 2015 and 2025.
  • Sought to synthesize both professional and peer-reviewed research.
  • Analyzed how literacy practices are framed as relational and contextually situated.
  • Literacy learning is framed as relational and contextually situated across the studies.
  • Storytelling serves as a practice where identity and agency are negotiated.
  • Community-based literacy initiatives are most effective when adopting relational triadic approaches rather than dyadic models.

Abstract

Abstract Community-based literacy research frequently positions storytelling and children’s literature as powerful sites for engaging learners in culturally responsive and critical literacy practices. This scoping review synthesises both professional and peer-reviewed research studies published between 2015 and 2025 to examine how such practices are enacted through relationships between schools, families, and communities across a variety of contexts. Analysis of 14 studies revealed that literacy learning is most commonly framed as relational and contextually situated, with storytelling functioning as a shared practice where identity and agency are negotiated. Across the literature, literacy practices and texts functioned as relational artefacts embedded within community life, rather than as standalone physical or symbolic resources. However, the review highlights a persistent limitation: while community-based literacy approaches frequently invited participation and rich meaning-making, fewer studies attended to how such practices were sustained through ongoing or embedded triadic arrangements involving people, places, and texts. The findings suggest that community-based literacy initiatives are most generative when they move beyond dyadic models of engagement and instead adopt relational triadic approaches that position schools, families, and communities as co-educators and co-creators within literacy practices.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Bradbury et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69fd7e42bfa21ec5bbf066f6https://doi.org/10.1007/s44020-026-00111-6
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Understanding literacy as human practice: exploring stories about (people like) us2024 · 4 citations
  2. 2Centering the collective in the (co)construction of equitable literacy spaces: an integrative critical literature review2026
  3. 3Writing Towards Others: Transnational Storytelling and the Relational Nature of Literacy2026
  4. 4Rewriting a Master Narrative2011
  5. 5Children Authoring Literacy and Community: A Discourse of Belonging in Elementary Classrooms2026