PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 8, 20260 citationsOpen Access

Immediate Effects of Mulligan’s Mobilization with and without Kinesio Taping on Pain, Range of Motion, and Cervical Proprioception in Patients with Chronic Neck Pain: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial

FDFatemeh DokhaeiASAzadeh ShadmehrKMKazem Malmir

Key Points

  • This study aims to assess the immediate effects of Mulligan's mobilization and Kinesio taping on pain and cervical mobility in patients with chronic neck pain.
  • Pilot randomized controlled trial with 24 participants aged 20–55 years.
  • Participants assigned to experimental (Mulligan’s mobilization + Kinesio taping) or control group (Mulligan’s mobilization alone).
  • Assessments for pain intensity, cervical range of motion, and proprioception conducted pre- and post-intervention.
  • Experimental group showed significant reduction in pain intensity (p < 0.001).
  • Cervical RoM improved significantly in flexion and left lateral flexion for the experimental group (p < 0.05).
  • Proprioception improved in the experimental group with significant betterment in repositioning accuracy (p = 0.02, p = 0.03).

Abstract

Background: Neck pain is a common musculoskeletal disorder frequently associated with proprioceptive impairments and reduced cervical mobility. This study aimed to evaluate the immediate effects of Mulligan’s mobilization and conventional physiotherapy, with and without Kinesio taping, on pain intensity, cervical range of motion (RoM), and proprioception in individuals with non-specific chronic neck pain.Methods: This pilot randomized controlled trial included 24 patients (9 men, 15 women; aged 20–55 years) with non-specific chronic neck pain. Participants were randomly assigned to either an experimental group receiving conventional physiotherapy, Mulligan’s mobilization, and Kinesio taping, or a control group receiving conventional physiotherapy and Mulligan’s mobilization alone. Pain intensity, active cervical RoM, and proprioception were assessed pre- and immediately post-intervention. Paired t-tests or Wilcoxon tests were used for within-group comparisons, and independent t-tests or Mann–Whitney tests for between-group comparisons.Results: Both groups demonstrated significant post-treatment reductions in pain intensity (control: p = 0.10; experimental: p 0.05).Conclusion: The addition of Mulligan’s mobilization to conventional physiotherapy reduced pain and improved cervical RoM, with greater benefits observed when combined with Kinesio taping. The combined intervention also resulted in superior improvements in cervical proprioception compared with Mulligan’s mobilization alone.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Dokhaei et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69fd7e42bfa21ec5bbf067b1https://doi.org/10.30476/jrsr.2025.104687.1532
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper