PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 8, 2026BMJ Open0 citationsOpen Access

Study protocol for a hybrid I randomised clinical trial to evaluate an audit and feedback and a pharmacist-led intervention to reduce potentially inappropriate medications in older adults: the AIM study

View Full Paper
ALAlfonso LeivaLALaura Gallardo AlfaroFBFerran Bejarano

Key Points

  • To determine the effectiveness of an audit and feedback intervention and a pharmacist-led intervention in reducing potentially inappropriate medications in older adults.
  • Conducting a two-arm, pragmatic, controlled trial with 170 participating GPs, randomized 1:1 into intervention or control groups.
  • Implementing feedback reports, pharmacist-led academic detailing, and online training modules as interventions.
  • Utilizing a random effects Tobit regression model to estimate between-group differences and evaluating implementation outcomes through a comprehensive framework.
  • The primary outcome measures the proportion of older adults aged ≥65 years receiving at least one potentially inappropriate medication at 12 months.
  • Subgroup analyses will assess variability in the intervention effects based on baseline prescribing level and healthcare region.
  • Implementation outcomes regarding reach, fidelity, engagement, and maintenance will be measured using a mixed-methods approach.

Abstract

Introduction Potentially inappropriate prescriptions (PIPs) in older adults, such as long-term use of benzodiazepines, proton pump inhibitors without indication or antipsychotics in dementia, are associated with adverse events and increased healthcare utilisation. Despite clinical guidelines discouraging their use, PIPs remain frequent in primary care. An audit and feedback (A&F) intervention of PIPs to general practitioners (GPs), led by pharmacists, may reduce the prescription of PIPs in primary care. Methods and analysis A two-arm, pragmatic, controlled trial will be conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of an A&F-based intervention and a pharmacist-led intervention to reduce the proportion of patients aged ≥65 years receiving inappropriate prescriptions. A total of 170 participating GPs, 85 per group, are required. GPs will be randomised into intervention or control groups (1:1). The intervention includes feedback reports, pharmacist-led academic detailing and access to online training modules. The primary outcome is the proportion of older adults receiving at least one PIP at 12 months as well as the total number of PIPs. A random effects Tobit regression model, censored at 0 and 100, will be used to estimate between-group differences adjusted for baseline prescribing. Subgroup analyses will explore heterogeneity of effect by baseline prescribing level and healthcare region. Implementation outcomes, including reach, fidelity, engagement and maintenance, will be evaluated using the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation and Maintenance framework, combining quantitative and qualitative data. Ethics and dissemination Ethical approval was obtained by the Balearic Island Committee Ethics (IB5219/23PI). Study findings, including primary and secondary outcomes and qualitative implementation results, will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and stakeholder reports. Trial registration number ISRCTN14449434 .

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Leiva et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69fd7f25bfa21ec5bbf077e0https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-104877
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1CONSORT 2010 Statement: Updated Guidelines for Reporting Parallel Group Randomized Trials2010 · 3,895 citations
  2. 2Potentially Inappropriate Medication Use in Primary Care in Switzerland2024 · 16 citations
  3. 3A pharmacist-led information technology intervention for medication errors (PINCER): a multicentre, cluster randomised, controlled trial and cost-effectiveness analysis2012 · 479 citations
  4. 4Adverse drug reactions in special populations – the elderly2015 · 588 citations
  5. 5A systematic review of the emerging definition of ‘deprescribing’ with network analysis: implications for future research and clinical practice.2015 · 876 citations