PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 10, 20260 citationsOpen Access

THE GEOMETRIZATION OF FUNDAMENTAL FIELDS AND THE MODAL DISCIPLINE OF THE THEORY OF OBJECTIVITY: a critical–propositional analysis of Ilija Barukčić's article A Geometrized Unified Field Theory in confrontation with the axioms, phenomenic elements, Inducer Effects, cosmogonic theorem, and cosmological Eras of TO

View Full Paper
VCVidamor CabannasDSDenivaldo Silva

Key Points

  • This analysis aims to evaluate the relationship between Barukčić’s geometrization of fundamental fields and the Theory of Objectivity.
  • Critical analysis of Barukčić’s geometrized unified field theory
  • Comparison with the seven modal axioms of Theory of Objectivity
  • Investigation of phenomenic elements and Inducer Effects in relation to Barukčić’s framework.
  • Barukčić's geometrization offers dialogue with TO but is seen as a derived stage of objectification.
  • Geometry is considered posterior to Nothingness in TO's framework.
  • Key concepts include knowledge as transcending quantum states and relationships between atomic radiations.

Abstract

This article presents a critical–propositional analysis of Ilija Barukčić’s article A Geometrized Unified Field Theory, published in Causation: International Journal of Science and deposited in Zenodo under DOI https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15449124. The analysis examines the possible compatibilities and points of tension between Barukčić’s proposal for a geometrized unification of the four fundamental fields of nature and the Theory of Objectivity (TO), developed by Vidamor Cabannas and Denivaldo Silva. The article discusses Barukčić’s tensorial framework, especially the proposed decomposition of the Ricci tensor into four fundamental fields, in confrontation with the seven modal axioms of the Theory of Objectivity. It also articulates the analysis with TO’s phenomenic elements, Inducer Effects, cosmogonic theorem, and cosmological Eras. Particular attention is given to the TO thesis that the substance transcending the quantum is knowledge or information produced in atomic relations and equivalent to atomic radiations. The study argues that Barukčić’s geometrization of matter, electromagnetic field, cosmological constant, curvature, non-locality, and spacetime quantization offers a highly relevant field of dialogue with TO. However, under the modal discipline of the Theory of Objectivity, such geometrization is interpreted as a derived stage in the objectification of the universe, rather than as the absolute first foundation. For TO, geometry remains posterior to Nothingness as a primitive and eternal mathematical essence, and must be understood in relation to boundary, observability, composition, field, radiation, and information. This analytical text counted on the analytical support of ChatGPT. Keywords Theory of Objectivity; Vidamor Cabannas; Denivaldo Silva; Ilija Barukčić; A Geometrized Unified Field Theory; geometrization; unified field theory; fundamental fields of nature; general relativity; Ricci tensor; electromagnetic field; cosmological constant; spacetime curvature; non-locality; spacetime quantization; modal axioms; phenomenic elements; Inducer Effects; cosmogonic theorem; cosmological Eras; atomic radiation; information; knowledge; quantum transcendence; ontology of physics; mathematical cosmology; Zenodo.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Cabannas et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a002147c8f74e3340f9c142https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20076753
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper