PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
December 23, 2002Annual Review of Psychology2,606 citations

Implicit Measures in Social Cognition Research: Their Meaning and Use

View Full Paper
RFRussell H. FázioMOMichael A. Olson

Key Points

  • To evaluate the mechanisms, predictive validity, and empirical utility of implicit measures in assessing psychological constructs such as attitudes, stereotypes, and self-esteem.
  • Reviewed empirical and theoretical literature on indirect measurement techniques across behavioral science.
  • Focused specifically on priming procedures and the Implicit Association Test to assess construct validity and context sensitivity.
  • Examined conditions governing the correspondence between implicit and explicit measures as well as behavioral predictability.
  • Implicit measures provide useful alternatives to direct self-reports by mitigating standard response biases across multiple domains of social cognition.
  • Predictive validity and the correlation between implicit and explicit measures depend heavily on situational context, underlying cognitive mechanisms, and construct malleability.

Abstract

Behavioral scientists have long sought measures of important psychological constructs that avoid response biases and other problems associated with direct reports. Recently, a large number of such indirect, or "implicit," measures have emerged. We review research that has utilized these measures across several domains, including attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes, and discuss their predictive validity, their interrelations, and the mechanisms presumably underlying their operation. Special attention is devoted to various priming measures and the Implicit Association Test, largely due to their prevalence in the literature. We also attempt to clarify several unresolved theoretical and empirical issues concerning implicit measures, including the nature of the underlying constructs they purport to measure, the conditions under which they are most likely to relate to explicit measures, the kinds of behavior each measure is likely to predict, their sensitivity to context, and the construct's potential for change.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Fázio et al. (2002) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a007aa7da5c1eb07f2dacdehttps://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.54.101601.145225
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper