PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 16, 2026International Journal Canada s Journal of Global Policy Analysis0 citationsOpen Access

Stronger alone? Canadian homeland defence amid great power competition

View Full Paper
AAAisha Ahmad

Key Points

  • The aim is to evaluate strategies for Canada to defend against threats from Russia and China while considering national resilience.
  • Evaluation of three deterrence pathways: reconfigured alliances, Total Defence, and nuclear weapons acquisition.
  • Analysis of the feasibility and effectiveness of a citizen-centred model for defence.
  • Identified Total Defence as the most viable and effective strategy for Canadian sovereignty.
  • Highlighted the importance of leveraging societal resilience and geography in defence planning.

Abstract

Canada faces an unprecedented convergence of threats from Russia, China, and the US, including coercive annexation attempts, Arctic competition, and the aggressive pursuit of critical natural resources. The Canadian Armed Forces is incapable of independently defending its territory against this confluence of threats. This article evaluates three plausible deterrence pathways available to Ottawa: reconfigured alliances, Total Defence, and nuclear weapons acquisition. This article contends that there is only one option that is both feasible and effective: a citizen-centred whole-of-society model that leverages Canada's geography and societal resilience to impose prohibitive costs on any prospective aggressor. A Total Defence strategy is the most realistic pathway to safeguard Canadian sovereignty in an era of renewed great power conquest.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Aisha Ahmad (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0809f1a487c87a6a40bc29https://doi.org/10.1177/00207020261452287
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper