PulseExploreJournal ClubResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeJournal ClubExplore
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 18, 2011RadiologyOpen Access

Relationship between Apparent Diffusion Coefficients at 3.0-T MR Imaging and Gleason Grade in Peripheral Zone Prostate Cancer

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

THThomas HambrockDSDiederik M. SomfordHHHenkjan Huisman

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Cite This Study

Hambrock et al. (2011) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0ea68ca14f152feaf9a84bhttps://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.11091409
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Validation of Pretreatment Nomograms for Predicting Indolent Prostate Cancer: Efficacy in Contemporary Urological Practice2008 · 70 citations
  2. 2Prostate cancer screening: The clinical value of diffusion‐weighted imaging and dynamic MR imaging in combination with T2‐weighted imaging2006 · 340 citations
  3. 3Local staging of prostate cancer with endorectal MR imaging: correlation with histopathology.1996 · 250 citations
  4. 4Value of Diffusion-Weighted Imaging for the Prediction of Prostate Cancer Location at 3T Using a Phased-Array Coil2007 · 173 citations
  5. 5Percent Gleason Grade 4/5 as Prognostic Factor in Prostate Cancer Diagnosed at Transurethral Resection2002 · 69 citations