PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
August 26, 20250 citationsOpen Access

Synthetic Data Generation for Bias Mitigation in AI: A Literature Review on Generative AI and Knowledge-Driven Methods

View Full Paper
SSS ShannonMRMahfuzur RahmanRGRoy George

Key Points

  • Synthetic data generation significantly improves equity by reducing biases in AI systems, enhancing fairness outcomes.
  • Generative AI techniques show promise in addressing dataset bias, evidenced by frameworks like FairGAN and FairCoT.
  • The review evaluates various knowledge-driven and generative methods, detailing their effectiveness in achieving fairness standards.
  • Continuous monitoring and adherence to ethical AI principles are crucial for the successful application of synthetic data approaches.

Abstract

AI systems may reproduce and amplify societal biases present in their training data as decision-making becomes more automated. The acknowledged biases present significant barriers to equity, accountability, and the ethical application of AI. This research review evaluates the efficacy of synthetic data generation through generative AI and knowledge-based methodologies in alleviating dataset bias and enhancing equality in AI systems. This study analyzes recent advancements in fairness-aware generative modeling, including text-to-image fairness algorithms like Fair Diffusion and FairCoT, knowledge-driven approaches such as DECAF and counterfactual GANs, as well as comprehensive frameworks like FairGAN and FairGen. The paper examines theoretical frameworks and empirical evaluations in graphical and tabular formats. The production of synthetic data can improve demographic representation and guarantee that results align with defined fairness standards. However, drawbacks still exist regarding the quality of annotations, scalability, equity trade-offs, and ethical considerations. So in this paper, we outline the potential research directions, including multimodal fairness frameworks, interactive refinement with human feedback, and fairness pretraining for foundational models. This analysis of ours indicates that not only are these approaches effective, but also they can be applied in various contexts. However, the success of these approaches relies on thorough implementation and continuous monitoring with a strong allegiance to ethical AI principles.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Shannon et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68af63ddad7bf08b1eae40b1https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202508.1686.v1
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Exploring Ethical Dimensions in AI: Navigating Bias and Fairness in the Field2024 · 9 citations
  2. 2Examining Ethical Aspects of AI: Addressing Bias and Equity in the Discipline2024 · 21 citations
  3. 3Bias and Fairness in AI Systems: A Study of Causes, Impacts, and Mitigation Strategies2025 · 1 citations
  4. 4Diverse Yet Biased: Towards Mitigating Biases in Generative AI (Student Abstract)2024 · 12 citations
  5. 5Auditing and instructing text-to-image generation models on fairness2024 · 43 citations