PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 10, 2025Malaysian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities (MJSSH)0 citationsOpen Access

IELTS Writing Task 2 Challenges Inventory: Reliability and Validity Assessments

View Full Paper
CSC. SuoBMBoon Yih MahNANur Ilianis Adnan

Key Points

  • The IWTCI was confirmed as a reliable and valid tool for identifying writing difficulties in EFL learners.
  • Psychometric analyses revealed strong internal consistency (Cronbach’s Alpha: 0.890 overall) and suitable factorability.
  • Descriptive statistics indicated Lexical Resources and Coherence/Cohesion received lower mean scores, highlighting major challenges.
  • Future research should integrate qualitative methods and expand samples to support strategies for improving IELTS performance.

Abstract

English as a Foreign Language (EFL) learners, especially Chinese undergraduates preparing for IELTS, face notable challenges in Writing Task 2, which demands advanced critical thinking and alignment with IELTS band descriptors (Task Response, Coherence/Cohesion, Lexical Resources, Grammatical Range/Accuracy), and this study aimed to validate the IELTS Writing Task 2 Challenges Inventory (IWTCI) by assessing its reliability and validity via a quantitative survey of 121 Chinese EFL students with IELTS training/testing experience who completed a 20-item Likert-scale questionnaire mapped to the four criteria. Psychometric analyses showed strong internal consistency (Cronbach’s Alpha: 0.815–0.890 for subscales, 0.890 overall) and suitable factorability (KMO ≥ 0.734, Bartlett’s p < 0.001), with descriptive statistics revealing lower mean scores in Lexical Resources (M = 1.34–1.95) and Coherence/Cohesion (M = 1.58–2.12) as primary challenges; the IWTCI was confirmed as a reliable and valid tool for identifying specific writing difficulties, highlighting the need for targeted instruction in lexical diversity and cohesive device use, and future research should expand samples and integrate qualitative methods to support evidence-based strategies for improving EFL learners’ IELTS performance.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Suo et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68c1a91354b1d3bfb60e2880https://doi.org/10.47405/mjssh.v10i6.3430
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1EXPERT REVIEW OF THE WeCWI-ENABLED TENCENT APPLICATIONS: INSIGHTS ON ENHANCING IELTS WRITING TASK 2 PERFORMANCE2025
  2. 2Documenting the Task Response Features of IELTS Writing Task 2, Band Scores 5-7 to Improve Teaching and Learning for Chinese Students Who Use IELTS Preparation Templates2024 · 3 citations
  3. 3Developing and validating an L2 writing willingness to communicate scale: A sequential embedded mixed-methods approach2024 · 1 citations
  4. 4EXPLORING LEARNERS’ CHALLENGES IN IELTS WRITING TASK 2: A THEMEBASED INSTRUCTION METHOD AT A FOREIGN LANGUAGE CENTER IN HO CHI MINH CITY2025
  5. 5Validity Verification of the New TOEFL Writing Task Based on Classical Test Theory2025