PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 10, 2025Liver International7 citationsOpen Access

Low‐Dose Hydrocortisone in Cirrhotic Patients With Septic Shock: A Double‐Blind Randomised Placebo‐Controlled Trial

View Full Paper
PMPhilippe MeerssemanMHMaría Hernández‐TejeroJDJuan Manuel Díaz

Key Points

  • Supplemental hydrocortisone did not enhance short-term survival in cirrhotic patients with septic shock requiring low-to-moderate vasopressors.
  • 28-day mortality rates were similar between the hydrocortisone group (35%) and placebo group (39.5%), indicating no effective treatment.
  • Most patients needed low-to-moderate doses of vasopressors, underscoring the severity and treatment challenges in this cohort.
  • The trial was stopped early with 83 patients enrolled due to slow inclusion rates, highlighting operational challenges in such studies.

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background and Aims Steroid supplementation remains controversial in septic shock, partly due to the heterogeneity of the populations studied. Cirrhotic patients with sepsis frequently develop relative adrenal insufficiency, showing poor response to vasopressors and poor prognosis. Early administration of low‐dose hydrocortisone might facilitate shock reversal and reduce mortality in this population. Methods Double‐blind, randomised, placebo‐controlled multicentre trial, enrolling adult cirrhotic patients with septic shock. Patients were assigned to receive i.v. hydrocortisone (100 mg followed by a continuous infusion of 200 mg/24 h) or placebo, for at least 3 days, followed by a tapering period of 3–7 days, depending on the time of shock resolution. Primary endpoint was 28‐day all‐cause mortality. Results After enrolment of 83 patients the trial was stopped early due to slow inclusions. Most patients required low‐to‐moderate doses of vasopressors. There was no difference in 28‐day mortality (35% vs. 39.5%; p = 0.84) between hydrocortisone and placebo groups. Shock resolution (85% vs. 72.1%; p = 0.25) and days to shock resolution 3 days (2.2–4; IQR) vs. 4 (2–7.5; IQR) were also similar between groups. More patients receiving placebo died of refractory shock (47.6% vs. 8.7%). No significant differences between treatment arms were observed in shock relapse, new shock episodes or bacterial or fungal superinfections during hospital stay. Hypo‐ and hyperglycaemias were more frequent in the hydrocortisone arm. Severity of ACLF at inclusion and inadequacy of empirical antibiotic therapy (HR = 6.40; 95% CI: 3.21–12.79) independently predicted 28‐day mortality. Conclusions Supplemental hydrocortisone did not improve short‐term survival in cirrhotic patients with septic shock requiring low‐to‐moderate doses of vasopressors. Trial Registration S‐number University Hospitals Leuven, Belgium: S55168; EUDRACT: 2010–024273‐38; Clinicaltrials.gov id: NCT02602210

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Meersseman et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68c1ad6a54b1d3bfb60e5d9dhttps://doi.org/10.1111/liv.70257
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper