In recent years, blockchain consensus mechanisms have evolved significantly from the original proof-of-work design, transitioning towards more efficient and scalable alternatives. This paper presents a comprehensive review and analysis framework for blockchain consensus mechanisms based on a systematic examination of 200+ publications. We categorize consensus mechanisms into four performance-oriented groups: high throughput, strong security, low energy, and flexible scaling, each addressing specific trade-offs in the blockchain trilemma of decentralization, security, and scalability. Through quantitative metrics including transactions per second, energy consumption, fault tolerance, and communication complexity, we evaluate mainstream mechanisms. Our findings reveal that no single consensus mechanism optimally satisfies all performance requirements, with each design involving explicit trade-offs. This paper provides researchers and practitioners with a structured framework for understanding these trade-offs and selecting appropriate consensus mechanisms for specific application contexts. Finally, we discussed future development trends, as well as regulatory and ethical considerations.
Shen et al. (2025) studied this question.