PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 23, 2025Advances in Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning0 citations

A Systematic Review of Artificial Intelligence Techniques for Phishing Detection

View Full Paper
AGAdrian J. Gonzalez‐AguirreLSLuis Fabián Salazar-Garcés

Key Points

  • Deep learning and generative AI models achieve higher accuracy in phishing detection, especially with unstructured datasets.
  • Techniques like convolutional neural networks and tuned large language models demonstrated over 99% accuracy in phishing tasks.
  • Performance varies based on dataset quality, algorithm architecture, and environment, highlighting the need for holistic evaluation.
  • Traditional machine learning algorithms performed well in structured data but struggled with adaptivity and representation in phishing contexts.

Abstract

This systematic review investigates the application and effectiveness of Artificial Intelligence techniques such as Machine Learning (ML), Deep Learning (DL), and Generative Artificial Intelligence (Gen AI) in the detection and/or prevention of Phishing attacks. The analysed studies were categorised into four groups: ML-based models, DL-based models, hybrid models (ML, DL, others), and Large Language Models (LLMs). The results reveal that none of the models consistently outperforms the others (regardless of context); however, performance depends on factors such as the quality of the dataset used, algorithm architecture, hyperparameter tuning and deployment environment. However, a clear trend emerged: DL and Gen AI-based models tend to achieve higher accuracy and stability, particularly in complex scenarios and when working with large or unstructured datasets. Techniques such as convolutional neural networks (CNN), short and long-term memory (LSTM), and temporal convolutional networks (TCN) demonstrated exceptional performance, achieving accuracies above 99%. Similarly, tuned LLMs such as GPT-2-medium and Llama-3-8b-instruct showed strong classification capabilities in phishing detection tasks. In contrast, traditional ML algorithms such as Random Forest and XGBoost performed well in structured and balanced data environments, but exhibited limitations in adaptivity and semantic representation. The findings emphasise the importance of a holistic approach that considers not only the algorithm itself, but also the quality of the input data, computational resources and the practical context of the implementation. This review aims to provide relevant information on modern AI techniques to strengthen cybersecurity measures against evolving phishing threats.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Gonzalez‐Aguirre et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68d4757f31b076d99fa6ccb4https://doi.org/10.54364/aaiml.2025.53231
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper