PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
October 3, 2025Eng—Advances in Engineering0 citationsOpen Access

Comprehensive Efficiency Analysis of Ethanol–Gasoline Blends in Spark Ignition Engines

View Full Paper
ÁSÁdám István SzabóZMZaid Tharwat MursiAWAnna Wégerer

Key Points

  • Using E30 blend increased fuel consumption by 11%, while reducing brake thermal efficiency by 0.78%.
  • At 2500 rpm and 12 bar BMEP, brake-specific fuel consumption spiked 6.6% with E30 compared to E10.
  • Peak combustion pressures were similar for both blends, but E30 experienced 3% lower peak combustion temperatures.
  • Measurements were taken using a four-stroke turbocharged SI engine test under various loads and speeds.

Abstract

This paper investigates the effects of using 10% v/v (E10) and 30% v/v (E30) ethanol–gasoline blends on spark ignition (SI) engine fuel consumption, brake-specific fuel consumption, brake thermal efficiency, combustion parameters and exhaust gas temperature. The 30% v/v ethanol–gasoline blend was designed not to exceed the octane number (RON and MON) of the regular commercially available reference fuel (E10); therefore, the knock resistance of the reference and research fuel does not differ significantly. The tests were conducted on an AVL internal combustion engine test cell using a four-stroke, four-cylinder, turbocharged SI engine with direct injection and a compression ratio of 12.2:1. The engine was manufactured in 2022, and it is the latest commercially available version currently in production. Engine tests were conducted under stoichiometric conditions (when possible) at loads ranging from 2–20 bar brake mean effective pressure and engine speeds ranging from 1000–6000 rpm, and the fuel consumption, brake-specific fuel consumption, combustion parameters, exhaust gas temperature and brake thermal efficiency were measured using the two different ethanol–gasoline blends. Test results showed that the higher concentration ethanol–gasoline blend—due to its lower density, lower heating value and higher latent heat of vaporization—had increased fuel consumption, brake-specific fuel consumption and decreased brake thermal efficiency, while exhaust gas temperature also decreased (at 2500 rpm 12 bar BMEP, the differences were 11%, 6.6%, −0.78% and −3.7%, respectively). Peak combustion pressures were identical under the same operating conditions, but the peak combustion temperature of E30 was on average 3% lower.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Szabó et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e040f7a99c246f578b3cd0https://doi.org/10.3390/eng6100256
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper