PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 13, 2024Clinical & Translational Oncology10 citationsOpen Access

Biomarkers in breast cancer 2024: an updated consensus statement by the Spanish Society of Medical Oncology and the Spanish Society of Pathology

View Full Paper
RCRámón ColomerBGBlanca González‐FarréABAna Isabel Ballesteros

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Abstract This revised consensus statement of the Spanish Society of Medical Oncology (SEOM) and the Spanish Society of Pathological Anatomy (SEAP) updates the recommendations for biomarkers use in the diagnosis and treatment of breast cancer that we first published in 2018. The expert group recommends determining in early breast cancer the estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), Ki-67, and Human Epidermal growth factor Receptor 2 (HER2), as well as BReast CAncer ( BRCA ) genes in high-risk HER2-negative breast cancer, to assist prognosis and help in indicating the therapeutic options, including hormone therapy, chemotherapy, anti-HER2 therapy, and other targeted therapies. One of the four available genetic prognostic platforms (Oncotype DX ® , MammaPrint ® , Prosigna ® , or EndoPredict ® ) may be used in ER-positive patients with early breast cancer to establish a prognostic category and help decide with the patient whether adjuvant treatment may be limited to hormonal therapy. In second-line advanced breast cancer, in addition, phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate 3-kinase catalytic subunit alpha (PIK3CA) and estrogen receptor 1 (ESR1) should be tested in hormone-sensitive cases, BRCA gene mutations in HER2-negative cancers, and in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), programmed cell death-1 ligand (PD-L1). Newer biomarkers and technologies, including tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs), homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) testing, serine/threonine kinase (AKT) pathway activation, and next-generation sequencing (NGS), are at this point investigational.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Colomer et al. (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e64d72b6db6435875de271https://doi.org/10.1007/s12094-024-03541-1
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Markers used in the pathogenesis and diagnosis of breast cancer2024
  2. 2Protein biomarkers for diagnosis of breast cancer2024 · 7 citations
  3. 3Supplementary biomarker testing in molecular tumor boards increases actionable therapy recommendations: a prospective real-world study of 658 patients2026
  4. 4Optimizing Extended Adjuvant Endocrine Therapy in Early HR+/HER2− Breast Cancer: The Emerging Role of Genomic Assays and ctDNA MRD2026
  5. 5The assessment of breast cancer biomarkers in diagnosis, prognosis and treatment monitoring: integrated analysis2025