PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 9, 2024Habitat International18 citationsOpen Access

Automating property valuation at the macro scale of suburban level: A multi-step method based on spatial imputation techniques, machine learning and deep learning

View Full Paper
PJPeyman JafaryDSDavood ShojaeiARAbbas Rajabifard

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Property valuation research, evolving with Automated Valuation Models (AVMs) using Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning (ML), encounters challenges in handling dynamic market conditions. While the market approach is a practical solution to complement the AVMs, it also suffers from different deficiencies, particularly in relying on subjective valuer judgment. In Australia's diverse real estate market, complete and up-to-date market data derived from recent transactions of the different property types within various suburbs can be crucial for valuers. However, accessing such data often comes at a high cost, and the availability of transaction data is limited, mainly when market analysis necessitates the consideration of property valuation across various property types and bedroom counts. Accordingly, this paper presents a novel multi-step method to estimate the median prices of different property types considering their bedroom counts at the suburban level in the Melbourne Metropolitan area to benefit valuers when adopting the market approach. Nine distinct and ensembled spatially-based imputation techniques of K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), Inverse Distance Weighted (IDW), Weighted KNN, Weighted IDW, Weighted KNN-IDW, Random Forest (RF), eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), RF-IDW-KNN and XGBoost-IDW-KNN are first employed to impute missing data on six market-related parameters obtained from the Real Estate Institute of Victoria (REIV). These parameters include median price (with no consideration of bedroom counts), price change, median rent, rental yield, clearance rate and days on market for houses and units. Next, based on these parameters, three ML algorithms—RF, Support Vector Regression (SVR) and XGBoost—are developed to estimate the median prices. Subsequently, the Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) technique is employed for Deep Learning (DL)-based spatiotemporal analysis, clustering suburbs based on property value fluctuations. Finally, these clusters are integrated into the ML models developed in the previous step as an auxiliary feature to assess their potential impact on enhancing price estimation accuracy. The results demonstrate promising accuracies for different property types based on different performance assessment metrics. The paper also underscores improved estimation accuracy by incorporating time series-based clustering as a supplementary parameter through transfer learning.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Jafary et al. (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e6fb9db6db64358767653ehttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2024.103075
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Machine Learning Algorithms and Explainable Artificial Intelligence for Property Valuation2025 · 5 citations
  2. 2Automated land valuation models: A comparative study of four machine learning and deep learning methods based on a comprehensive range of influential factors2024 · 33 citations
  3. 3Comparative Analysis of Machine Learning Algorithms for Predicting House Prices2024
  4. 4Comparative Analysis of Machine Learning Algorithms for Predicting House Prices2024
  5. 5Comparing hedonic and machine learning models in residential property valuation: evidence from sub-market analysis in Italy2026