PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 13, 2024Deleted Journal2 citationsOpen Access

An Empirical Analysis of the Effect of Ballot Truncation on Ranked-Choice Electoral Outcomes

View Full Paper
MDMallory DickersonEMErin MartinDMDavid McCune

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

In ranked-choice elections voters cast preference ballots which provide a voter's ranking of the candidates. The method of ranked-choice voting (RCV) chooses a winner by using voter preferences to simulate a series of runoff elections. Some jurisdictions which use RCV limit the number of candidates that voters can rank on the ballot, imposing what we term a truncation level, which is the number of candidates that voters are allowed to rank. Given fixed voter preferences, the winner of the election can change if we impose different truncation levels. We use a database of 1183 real-world ranked-choice elections to empirically analyze the potential effects of imposing different truncation levels in ranked-choice elections. Our general finding is that if the truncation level is at least three then restricting the number of candidates on the ballot rarely affects the election winner.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Dickerson et al. (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e796bdb6db643587706d5fhttps://doi.org/10.46787/pump.v7i0.3778
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper