PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
October 20, 20250 citationsOpen Access

Revisiting Reinforcement Learning for LLM Reasoning from A Cross-Domain Perspective

View Full Paper
ZCZhoujun ChengSHShibo HaoTLTianyang Liu

Key Points

  • RL significantly improves reasoning in various domains, with cross-domain training enhancing performance.
  • Guru, a curated RL reasoning corpus, contains 92K examples across six domains, ensuring reliable training signals.
  • Lack of pretraining exposure in Logic, Simulation, and Tabular may hinder performance, requiring more in-domain training.
  • Models Guru-7B and Guru-32B demonstrate state-of-the-art results, outperforming baselines on a 17-task evaluation suite.

Abstract

Reinforcement learning (RL) has emerged as a promising approach to improve large language model (LLM) reasoning, yet most open efforts focus narrowly on math and code, limiting our understanding of its broader applicability to general reasoning. A key challenge lies in the lack of reliable, scalable RL reward signals across diverse reasoning domains. We introduce Guru, a curated RL reasoning corpus of 92K verifiable examples spanning six reasoning domains--Math, Code, Science, Logic, Simulation, and Tabular--each built through domain-specific reward design, deduplication, and filtering to ensure reliability and effectiveness for RL training. Based on Guru, we systematically revisit established findings in RL for LLM reasoning and observe significant variation across domains. For example, while prior work suggests that RL primarily elicits existing knowledge from pretrained models, our results reveal a more nuanced pattern: domains frequently seen during pretraining (Math, Code, Science) easily benefit from cross-domain RL training, while domains with limited pretraining exposure (Logic, Simulation, and Tabular) require in-domain training to achieve meaningful performance gains, suggesting that RL is likely to facilitate genuine skill acquisition. Finally, we present Guru-7B and Guru-32B, two models that achieve state-of-the-art performance among open models RL-trained with publicly available data, outperforming best baselines by 7.9% and 6.7% on our 17-task evaluation suite across six reasoning domains. We also show that our models effectively improve the Pass@k performance of their base models, particularly on complex tasks less likely to appear in pretraining data. We release data, models, training and evaluation code to facilitate general-purpose reasoning at: https://github.com/LLM360/Reasoning360

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Cheng et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68f6379bb481a140a36cf61ehttps://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2506.14965
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper