Background/Objectives: This systematic review aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and feasibility of “exercise snacks,” brief, intermittent bouts of physical activity designed to interrupt prolonged sedentary behavior. The review synthesized findings across metabolic, cardiovascular, cognitive, and functional health domains to identify consistent patterns of benefit and determine their practical applicability across populations. Methods: A total of 26 studies met inclusion criteria, encompassing diverse populations such as healthy adults, older adults, and individuals with obesity, type 2 diabetes, or PCOS. Following the PRISMA 2020 guidelines, comprehensive searches were conducted across PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and CINAHL databases for studies published between 2012 and 2025. Eligible studies included randomized controlled trials, crossover trials, and feasibility studies assessing health outcomes following exercise snack interventions in adults. Data were extracted using standardized protocols, and methodological quality was evaluated using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 tool and Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Narrative synthesis was prioritized due to intervention heterogeneity. Results: Exercise snacks consistently improved postprandial glucose, insulin, and triglyceride responses, reduced blood pressure, preserved endothelial and cerebral blood flow, and enhanced cardiorespiratory fitness. Older adults demonstrated significant gains in lower-limb strength and mobility. Emerging evidence also indicated improvements in mood, fatigue, and cognitive performance. Feasibility trials confirmed high acceptability and adherence across settings and age groups. Conclusions: Exercise snacking represents a time-efficient, feasible, and evidence-based strategy to mitigate the health risks of sedentary behavior. By incorporating brief, frequent activity bouts into daily routines, individuals can achieve meaningful benefits in metabolic regulation, cardiovascular health, physical function, and cognitive well-being. Future research should refine optimal protocols and explore long-term sustainability across varied populations.
Alexe et al. (2025) studied this question.