PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
December 1, 2025Age and Ageing0 citationsOpen Access

Door to Imaging Time: Better but Still Not Good Enough

View Full Paper
BTB P TeehanConnolly Hospital BlanchardstownMFMarianne FoleyConnolly Hospital BlanchardstownLDLisa DonaghyConnolly Hospital Blanchardstown

Key Points

  • Significant improvement in DTI time, with 60.7% of patients imaged within one hour.
  • Between January 1st and June 30th, 2024, 150 patients diagnosed with stroke on neuroimaging were analyzed.
  • Audit approach assessed adherence to best practice targets, focusing on clinical diagnosis and imaging delays.
  • Continued emphasis on early recognition and prioritization of strokes is critical for patient outcomes.

Abstract

Abstract of primary author Background Acute stroke is a medical emergency associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Timely neuroimaging is essential, with an estimated loss of 2 million neurons per minute of ischaemia. The 2023 National Clinical Guidelines for Stroke recommend brain imaging be performed as soon as possible and within one hour of hospital arrival for all patients with suspected stroke. Methods This audit aimed to evaluate adherence to best practice targets for door-to-imaging (DTI) time in our model three center, building on a 2021 audit where 45% of patients with confirmed stroke had DTI times greater than four hours. Since then, outsourcing of CT vetting and reporting was introduced to improve imaging access. We reviewed all patients presenting to this model three center between January and June 2024 with confirmed ischaemic or haemorrhagic stroke on neuroimaging. Patients were stratified by DTI time: within one hour, between one and four hours, and greater than four hours. Cases exceeding four hours were further analyzed to determine the reasons for delay. Results Between January 1st and June 30th, 2024, 150 patients were diagnosed with stroke on neuroimaging. Of these, 91 patients (60.7%) were imaged within one hour, 36 (24%) within one to four hours, and 23 (15.3%) after more than four hours. In the delayed imaging group, four were not initially recognized as stroke, eight were diagnosed clinically as TIA and not prioritized for urgent imaging, one experienced a delay in performing the scan, and ten had delays in scan ordering. Conclusion Access to timely imaging has improved significantly in this center, with a notable reduction in prolonged DTI times. Continued emphasis on early stroke recognition and prioritization of imaging, particularly in suspected TIA cases, is essential to optimize patient outcomes.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Teehan et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69402a652d562116f29019dbhttps://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afaf318.111
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1An Evaluation Of Time To Review And Brain Imaging Of Inpatient Strokes: Are We Too Slow When Patients Are FAST?2024
  2. 2Stroke Imaging Performance Assessment at a Community-based Hospital2024
  3. 3Abstract WP183: Improved Door-to-Needle Times by Moving the Needle to CT: Results of a Community System’s Process to Move Initial Stroke Care to CT2026
  4. 4Time Matters: Reducing Door to Needle Times in a Major Stroke Centre2025
  5. 5Implementation of stroke protocol: Insights from a tertiary care facility in urban India2024