PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 8, 2026Nauka bezbednost policija1 citationsOpen Access

Artificial intelligence in criminal justice: Predictive tools, evidentiary challenges and human rights implications

OKOlga Koshevaliska

Key Points

  • This research aims to investigate the integration of AI technologies in criminal justice and their impact on rights and fairness.
  • Critical examination of AI applications in crime prediction and evidence analysis
  • Focus on predictive policing algorithms and facial recognition systems
  • Analysis of the implications for human rights and procedural safeguards
  • AI can improve efficiency in criminal justice practices but poses risks to basic rights.
  • Concerns about transparency and systemic bias threaten fair legal processes.
  • Uncritical AI adoption may undermine constitutional guarantees like the presumption of innocence.

Abstract

Integrating artificial intelligence (AI) technologies into criminal justice systems introduces both transformative opportunities and profound legal dilemmas. This paper critically examines the use of AI in crime prediction, risk assessment, evidence analysis and sentencing, with particular attention to its impact on fundamental procedural rights. Focusing on predictive policing algorithms, facial recognition systems, and AI-assisted evidence review, the research explores how these tools reshape police, prosecutorial and judicial discretion. Key challenges include transparency, explainability and risks of systemic bias or "automated justice", contrasted with constitutional guarantees such as the presumption of innocence, the right to a fair trial and the principle of legality. The study concludes that while AI can enhance efficiency and accuracy, its uncritical adoption may jeopardize essential human rights protections unless accompanied by robust procedural safeguards. Artificial intelligence should serve as an instrument of human progress, not as a substitute for human judgment.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Olga Koshevaliska (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/698828eb0fc35cd7a8848c81https://doi.org/10.5937/nabepo31-62922
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN CRIMINAL JUSTICE ADMINISTRATION : PREDICTIVE POLICING, SENTENCING ALGORITHMS, AND CONSTITUTIONAL CONCERNS2026
  2. 2ETHICAL AND LEGAL IMPLICATIONS OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE (AI) IN CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM2025
  3. 3The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Criminal Justice2024 · 1 citations
  4. 4Legal Challenges in Regulating Artificial Intelligence Use in Criminal Justice Systems2025 · 2 citations
  5. 5Artificial Intelligence in Forensic Investigations. Doctrinal Gaps, Fundamental Rights and the Rule of Law2025